IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Intended status of draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Fri, 16 October 2020 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E2B3A09E9; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PlaMOpJ9WBv8; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34DD23A0A2B; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id a9so3964146lfc.7; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VQ5cuj5TvOT9tilHumw57PMsppxFVQAbuibUC2wbGBo=; b=NM9wFqhUWtw9seIRRBBn8eeBfQrHeOst6QZRRWEP9Ye8emS3SDtACTkdMBxoma3A2a Wm4GKZnIKJXmMmWqhVEilich/Awk+QIQmSIR9nremZhkFlVLrxc1npB0cgsYXzyi1xkZ ZEtqtOX53zozn9eqkfZ28wZhBcknCse3CttDcTEHRV3VArYNnvJWy45IteFyj1e0JxOt MJ2hJvSJS26fIpIfvC78x9pFhymKNvGIU8257kMXxfIc6UAgr34zZvKshQeoxq48o0OB DiVe0qKMrNsePzAoPXbzqQSWeyAwdutlGioI6lZqTH9LbRGGuEPrFzXr5KllSLdKBstn jAfA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VQ5cuj5TvOT9tilHumw57PMsppxFVQAbuibUC2wbGBo=; b=qIAFAR2zVsZ6nUWh1Ng81bN7W6RokzAQFtMf6Te8VHW3RIyOAh0fESvyIc8cBcL9sl 3LxVKJUBqOfb+ynOJppelgQOZANqylxlzXzgsimg0Rlu7oyHUIOP55pcVmLQyFEL35b8 w3WWSGtWoc4s7p2uWlp6VtqZ8qpc1y37S2rZFyoZR/H9d3RRaCaIowogcTaU2TkJdR+m kxXjYH9zqyIzyLbrZWdfMDNwmcg3+TD58PopfL/+yCS677aRtZlEPMWbWGqN7zj249nn P/1WiNDkB8+MXy/gOz9m0MCN3P3sj0Yl+iKkmZomvGYWG/EAR21S2Y2FkPjtcZXo7Tri vx/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532naZ58ACiXFhOhSHtmuwZAkxOAlPOrvDZqGfMeTue7Ro4VP/mM aWQtYfBNVS9smxlZIzgFbIf+eGMAeimiZK6PkIA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwmvdmJ3sSb1lAIEQjy8E0F8+xfUm2pWvbSHNXheK7f+kUn8JaeWJmJpBejfojRTLWokDBNa5TCmRT9gRF/mDo=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:c6d6:: with SMTP id w205mr1964439lff.94.1602870120324; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+RyBmViLvqf6hZzsB704MC95fdYc36v7tb96itzHWaGeLaRKw@mail.gmail.com> <B60F8567-DFA1-4414-A663-C150D4B199D9@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <B60F8567-DFA1-4414-A663-C150D4B199D9@gmail.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:44:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmXoP9_5by6yTsqQL583F_9-o0dg9Fn4vKV0N-gzGmNR4w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology@ietf.org, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000024a30105b1cd4869"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/Ojh4tQ591Rabile_X9VaFNMU0cg>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Intended status of draft-ietf-mpls-spl-terminology
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 17:42:04 -0000

Hi Stewart,
thank you for the quick response. It makes sense. I was a bit puzzled.

Regards,
Greg

On Fri, Oct 16, 2020, 10:33 Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> wrote:

> Greg
>
> It updates an ST RFC so it has to be ST.
>
> I think the draft is right (it changed) but the shepherd forgot to update
> the tracker.
>
> - Stewart
>
> > On 16 Oct 2020, at 15:59, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Authors,
> > hope you can clarify the intended status of the draft. I've noticed that
> the datatracker reflects it as Informational while the document itself
> states that is on the Standards track. As I understand RFC 2026 a document
> is either on Standards or non-Standards, e.g., Informational track.
> > Thank you in advance.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Greg
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpls mailing list
> > mpls@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email