Re: [mpls] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10: (with COMMENT)

[Lizhong Jin <[e-mail]>]

Hi Stephen,
See inline below. Thanks.

Lizhong

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> - 3.2: The description of the destination address offset isn't
> clear to me. If this is some common thing in MPLS though, that's
> fine. If not, maybe it'd be worth being clearer here.
> (It does become clear later though, so this is a nit.)
>
> [Lizhong] I read several times, and try to make it more clear as below:

Destination Address Offset: an offset (octets) to indicate the
      position of the Relayed Address Entry which is also the

      destination address of the Reply or Relayed Reply message.

      E.g., to point the first entry on the top of the Stack of

      Relayed Addresses will have offset of 0, and to point to

      the second entry will have offset of the length of the first entry.