Re: [mpls] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10: (with COMMENT)

Lizhong Jin <lizho.jin@gmail.com> Wed, 30 September 2015 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <lizho.jin@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE3E1B5EB5; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oRocqXkdNu05; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6672B1B5E7E; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so204648027wic.1; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:57:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=7pCNK+SOTHYKjwf3LIjPCSBnX5L937aK9DP3lRJDFJg=; b=wJ/aKNXWjqnhtLoPbr+Oc4Ga2ueCk03VuiSmCySCmylgCp8ESy15LklPJLXC+/bUG0 H8EJRdr3RwDja/3AcAum1WGxfwfxKAbWNdnLE8f/mqRpcRkSwsWzGPtjuzzp+gbh7inJ Fq10jxEPnVryTJLqQdjPc5beoaFgqKYsQh03LpjF0ueqYA1q3oFSRJRj6Y5Ld6vgu2FA +pdjEWXbrEpgljk9MmBZIt3XXVMXVeNzbmsHnhfnSQt8QmF9p/VcREX4cnRaEf9oKqIN ory9L4yupNZBJ+CJBSGxJWSA76a+DElmUgieb/47DzAKirCvaBkijTf91/RcOwGeWi1N sMEA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.48.102 with SMTP id k6mr5864829wjn.124.1443628639888; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.236.164 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150930124330.1948.32154.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20150930124330.1948.32154.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 23:57:19 +0800
Message-ID: <CAH==cJwSx51qXJ7f29tWDHa9xfuGXd_dze=UizLW3jFEf-0xYQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lizhong Jin <lizho.jin@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b86da5244d6e30520f8fc23
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/Os_RuBZB6HKfuzLR4WlWy03KRZk>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:57:23 -0000

Hi Stephen,
See inline below. Thanks.

Lizhong

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
wrote:

> Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> - 3.2: The description of the destination address offset isn't
> clear to me. If this is some common thing in MPLS though, that's
> fine. If not, maybe it'd be worth being clearer here.
> (It does become clear later though, so this is a nit.)
>
> [Lizhong] I read several times, and try to make it more clear as below:

Destination Address Offset: an offset (octets) to indicate the
      position of the Relayed Address Entry which is also the

      destination address of the Reply or Relayed Reply message.

      E.g., to point the first entry on the top of the Stack of

      Relayed Addresses will have offset of 0, and to point to

      the second entry will have offset of the length of the first entry.