Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-rfc6374-sfl

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Thu, 27 April 2017 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD26129AA8; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 08:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mi7uRgpwkk1K; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 08:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x242.google.com (mail-wr0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC89B1270A7; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 07:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x242.google.com with SMTP id v42so4075739wrc.3; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 07:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cqcexBM06rcyDENw/CwwZeI/nn3bkpfbF1UnFapphdM=; b=i8sk5JEOT4wB9tnFlHxc9YoK7N0kUGY28r373C2yYi68raSx2bszGrXJ/6OqzwIoHA 2TCCILq0a/uUhJrBWpwJtOz/tRi0vaf+nhBfhNHF2gLKfYSaF9lkC4F30glFWkvZP3XL woROWbv5yqoGYqIOYlzTTaXSF4LW2lmQGuuOnWWLRUTlAAf2XG0tDBtvYOVvtnYdiown 4sMYp8XrHEd/u9lgGmvV9kzVLHcncT0IbPmTYDkdiO95jfeLW1DCfymsUG0cJlPTQUdu nZTdfJgfoiKpt5GdfPWYwMor2tDPNWahse6q5coMsPRkPTpZvlsSFRhWxRO9kDWLNNVP AZKg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cqcexBM06rcyDENw/CwwZeI/nn3bkpfbF1UnFapphdM=; b=mAhvqOq2mJgMdOZvu50ElmL3fDl8ppiL5Irhye20lMuE3MdL7c6paeAanygetsRFyj U7eQBEzgMrvTPQz+FvjQ3NfOzgsYW3iR81ZN6/kL+XUvfyICHetP0rQT91OSfH57LKrl 68y2Kg5dDIMZF0jnox+nJHbC6gZ8KGhwDJb5zz+SthsyI2AdpJmhsdof5nRsjOyB3wZw sjf9Syxr5b6cqOImFZ4YguwFlUMaLyBj8AZNJN3Ha2f3AlZeSlv0BqZYq99xQFTBFpNy QvS5ItrrTSDMIbOSuEr5OobKJHZ5RcUP2Lx4jqhrDwIzx2PddLorkU+A8XWWZrkfVBfu Xbng==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4aPALh5XVTMb/AEGpBXcHS6CwhcFyJvCCmOqM2Dez1ruXp+WAI iyM9tapXHxNPywwI2zI=
X-Received: by 10.223.161.70 with SMTP id r6mr3847656wrr.65.1493305198342; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 07:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.126] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h199sm9595911wme.4.2017.04.27.07.59.57 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Apr 2017 07:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <8b495d71-1291-cd59-9faa-fff371c9535f@pi.nu>
Cc: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-bryant-mpls-rfc6374-sfl@ietf.org
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <89bff07e-357e-cb5d-84aa-a5a7eaefd60f@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 15:59:50 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8b495d71-1291-cd59-9faa-fff371c9535f@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/P7Oz_-PbeypWU6mo3RieEN1y-9U>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-bryant-mpls-rfc6374-sfl
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 15:01:35 -0000

There is Cisco IPR declared against synonymous flow labels (see 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-bryant-mpls-sfl-framework)

This solution uses SFL, so I wrote to the Cisco Patent department on 9 
March this year requesting a disclosure against this draft. I understand 
that the matter is in hand.

Best regards

Stewart

On 27/04/2017 04:31, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> The author of draft-bryant-mpls-rfc6374-sfl has told us that
> the document is ready to be considered for working adoption.
>
> The document been through MPLS-RT review. We will do an IPR poll
> parallel to the start of the adoption poll.
>
> This mail starts the IPR poll.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-bryant-mpls-rfc6374-sfl?
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> There is one IPR disclosure filed directly against this document.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The
> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
> received from each author and contributor.
>
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>
> /Loa
> mpls wg co-chair