Re: [mpls] Document (draft-ietf-mpls-rmr) returned to working group - poll for interest.

Kireeti Kompella <kireeti.kompella@gmail.com> Wed, 21 October 2020 22:20 UTC

Return-Path: <kireeti.kompella@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83DCE3A0A92; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ReENQt2e4JKD; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32e.google.com (mail-ot1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 579453A0A88; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id f10so3345707otb.6; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=g/7ThCu12c9DWT9jFB06QgBk+H2BnJgL/DbQCdYhNJ8=; b=nvyehr5guMJtDxdZXn3VOORxtXckoe1vS7CIWWf8eH7myxkDgN1RtrmO6O0Hc/XN7/ LJIoo2TvzVIDl9shaWg+xQ6W7TMVc6kcrvs3I/Xi5PYDqPjudMsVorb0NfkCPDAbX/kF fsF0EHaQVsiwxxhqiVLubQx7lXpx2mXZQ4MkkhrFK14E6y7eb8ngm2W5R2/N6K4PM+qS nAKWB5vKIpywuaKeEaDCvJZi4bQ2upQO2qlvP1J6G9dtm1Q5Jc8R1vsGObfdFuntNwbK uK910SqSzp1B/3n3erywg/QIBZtA3pWZMDSFqSXoNoBcnRPGV3KRGkApHVK+8Mlc4t33 QHsA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject :from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=g/7ThCu12c9DWT9jFB06QgBk+H2BnJgL/DbQCdYhNJ8=; b=FA44oyGiIN2KVrSBX+IYJkFGipJZ0kW/uzXODqp/MMMZ8tZNGY4mexw0WXg5Szvh2w tI5ELwMRRQ5SFwwqx8d0+7sk2iAG9ucZOKc9FbZ0B0sqdeyPyoHlP1eIszYWRNADT0Lu aIb5oaIWDiepA/O9RiHxARNKyO3oOCWfKnrCO0SG/MFO+4PRwYXebl9EC3ByxhWhyXjk yoWuMusjhacTHD7v5a3lUX7l1h4OeodV2ZcVAmzQkTjlRu9AOlFN84jDQcQOCE1yz8h4 ta+djYI6ig4WjuQSjbcnW24KnSnXtEMkdQ2qDAkn+aAvxPHk4w/nZlx23Am1mrd/AsSv wjAw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532WbXhA/5lp6j3fWgZnTX4WXpRQqJWhJJUO/aMw0/kpYTZPl/vG f8p8UJ/04FfpYyTugGhHFlI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw2Z85c+t8J8vUTPGwCDpYxInVqpcvW1Pfs/N8Aua1f0As1WJj55xZsts412Ps3UfWwbkJQ7A==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1347:: with SMTP id r7mr4182630otq.172.1603318840568; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:20:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:1702:1d00:1dd0:9df0:4017:e396:4651? ([2600:1702:1d00:1dd0:9df0:4017:e396:4651]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u125sm1104800oif.21.2020.10.21.15.20.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti.kompella@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b0453453-b7c9-ed06-f359-459137ad4c2a@pi.nu>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:20:38 -0700
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-rmr@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-rmr@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, Deborah A Brungard <db3546@att.com>, "mpls-ads@ietf.org" <mpls-ads@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <D6BE2613-9DB8-4A0A-A892-2F198E31EE11@gmail.com>
References: <b0453453-b7c9-ed06-f359-459137ad4c2a@pi.nu>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (17G68)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/PQUXX5VMS3hriZKG5He9wSNYgB0>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Document (draft-ietf-mpls-rmr) returned to working group - poll for interest.
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:20:43 -0000

Hi Loa,

To your questions:
- I think this document is of interest; we have implemented a prototype, and seen interest from SPs, and done some demos.
- there is not much further work needed as all the previous directorate reviews have been addressed (of course, a new WGLC/IETF LC may uncover some new nits/comments).

Said as a co-author on the draft.
Kireeti 

> On Oct 2, 2020, at 09:04, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:
> 
> Working Group,
> 
> This mail starts a two week poll to establish the interest to continue work on draft-ietf-mpls-rmr.
> 
> draft-ietf-mpls-rmr were returned to the working to the working group (about 2 weeks ago).
> 
> Normally a document is returned this late in the process when a necessary change is discovered that requires working group consensus (i.e. a wglc) to implement. This time the document were returned due to lack of (or very slow) response to directorate or the IESG reviews.
> 
> When a document is returned for a well defined technical change it is fairly easy to handle, we make the change and do a wglc.
> 
> I have spent time trying to figure out what to do in a case like this. There is very little information in our process document. The wg chairs has converged on the following small process.
> 
> - establish wg interest for the document, i.e. is this something we want to do and do we have interest participating in progressing the document.
> - leave approximately 2 weeks for working group discussion
> - wglc
> - when comments from the wglc is resolved, redo the publication request
> 
> This document start a two week poll to establish the level of interest to continue to work on draft-ietf-mpls-rmr.
> 
> Please answer the following 2 questions:
> 
> - do you think draft-ietf-mpls-rmr is need and will actually be deployed?
> 
> - do you have the cycles to contribute to progressing the document
> 
> /Loa
> for the working group chairs
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64