Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-p2mp-framework

Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com> Fri, 15 November 2013 21:25 UTC

Return-Path: <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E75B21F9F03 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:25:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1+55PsbXEzAD for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:25:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usevmg21.ericsson.net (usevmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B1621F9E50 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:25:22 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c6180641-b7fbd8e0000011cc-f0-5286913efdaf
Received: from EUSAAHC003.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.81]) by usevmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id ED.7C.04556.E3196825; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 22:25:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from EUSAAMB103.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.120]) by EUSAAHC003.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.81]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:25:18 -0500
From: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, Zhenlong Cui <c-sai@bx.jp.nec.com>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-p2mp-framework
Thread-Index: AQHOzwfaIG3lunalsUq9rl/3+CCjF5oU30CAgABOIYCAAjx4AIAE1/QAgAjTl4CAAEiQAIAAsEWAgADYnACAAAtfwA==
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 21:25:17 +0000
Message-ID: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B713560@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
References: <5260B904.2090802@pi.nu> <015a01cecf07$abeefcd0$03ccf670$@bx.jp.nec.com> <52771FCD.1030406@labn.net> <00c701ced93b$d04fed80$70efc880$@bx.jp.nec.com> <52794190.9060303@labn.net> <527D51B6.1060106@labn.net> <097b01cee12f$d1590df0$740b29d0$@bx.jp.nec.com> <5284F610.6050807@labn.net> <00a201cee1ac$3c2efd20$b48cf760$@bx.jp.nec.com> <52863FA2.1070604@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <52863FA2.1070604@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.135]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrILMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPoK7dxLYggwX/rCzeHvrHaLFvywc2 i47mtywWt5auZHVg8ejd+4PRY8mSn0weHzY1s3l8ufyZLYAlissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugStjx45u 9oI1LBXTF21ma2BcxNzFyMkhIWAi8ab1DwuELSZx4d56NhBbSOAIo8T6Rp0uRi4gezmjxNyF L8GK2ASMJF5s7GEHsUUEMiQm3DgDNohZIFviW89TsLiwQJDE9lN3WCBqgiVePn8CVMMBZGdJ /PprBxJmEVCV2LZ1LtguXgFfiTs9W5ghdv1ikpjfeRsswSmgIXGveTcriM0IdNz3U2uYIHaJ S9x6Mp8J4mgBiSV7zkM9Iyrx8vE/VghbWeL7nEcsEPU6Egt2f2KDsLUlli18zQyxWFDi5Mwn LBMYxWYhGTsLScssJC2zkLQsYGRZxchRWpxalptuZLiJERhNxyTYHHcwLvhkeYhRmoNFSZz3 y1vnICGB9MSS1OzU1ILUovii0pzU4kOMTBycUg2Mm9L/iif95P8kt0f86DeNBbOltBo3LRF5 ttykKGGRSqeSaIqXnWZt187cG1cmn+77ob9VWKXy77SULR7Z3IE9p4QL5DJbnm2c8OpiyaPJ a9Jn9L6fsCxo0+PEyZMC5K4u4bjO0VjEFGdT+ehY3RffL3OS+SdeO8vg/m5P94LTz0pvOPUu 2/52kxJLcUaioRZzUXEiAIMFWvB0AgAA
Cc: "draft-ietf-mpls-tp-p2mp-framework@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-p2mp-framework@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-p2mp-framework
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 21:25:32 -0000

Hi Lou,
I've got confused with use of ME in 

Which will result in:
     All the traffic sent over a P2MP transport path, including
     OAM packets generated by a MEP, is sent (multicast) from the
     root towards all the leaves, and thus may be processed by all
     the MEs in a P2MP MEG.

Maintenance Entity (ME) is association of two or more MEPs. Perhaps it should be "by all Maintenance Points (MPs) in a P2MP MEG" since in MPLS-TP MEG consists of only one ME and thus both terms can be used interchangeably.

	Regards,
		Greg