[mpls] Collecting comments on associated bidirectional LSP
zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn Fri, 03 September 2010 05:31 UTC
Return-Path: <zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F1B3A67F4; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 22:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -98.656
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.656 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=3.182, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hDPL7I6GvlTh; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 22:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx6.zte.com.cn [63.218.89.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC37E3A66B4; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 22:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.34.0.130] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 35102043691617; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:30:57 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.32.0.74] by [192.168.168.15] with StormMail ESMTP id 65413.2809952657; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:31:53 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse3.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id o835VvDw059622; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:31:57 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn)
To: "mpls-tp@ietf.org" <mpls-tp@ietf.org>, ccamp@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.4 March 27, 2005
Message-ID: <OFB9334E1C.7AE7FC9A-ON48257793.001B6DF7-48257793.001ECD5C@zte.com.cn>
From: zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:31:40 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 6.5.4|March 27, 2005) at 2010-09-03 13:31:49, Serialize complete at 2010-09-03 13:31:49
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 001ECD5748257793_="
X-MAIL: mse3.zte.com.cn o835VvDw059622
Subject: [mpls] Collecting comments on associated bidirectional LSP
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 05:32:05 -0000
Hi all, Associated bidirectional LSP, defined in RFC5654, is useful for protection switching, for OAM that requires a reply (from MIP or MEP), and for defect correlation. There are potentially several solutions, such as GMPLS call, the Association object, and the LSP_TUNNEL_INTERFACE_ID object. Furthermore, the scheme based on the extensions to the Association object has been presented in IETF77, and there are some discussions on the mailinglist. We need to receive more comments on this topic to push this work forward, then update the document, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-00, which is recently expired. Any comments are welome. B.R. Fei :)
- [mpls] Collecting comments on associated bidirect… zhang.fei3
- Re: [mpls] Collecting comments on associated bidi… Sterling Lamberto
- Re: [mpls] Collecting comments on associated bidi… zhang.fei3
- Re: [mpls] Collecting comments on associated bidi… Lamberto Sterling
- Re: [mpls] Collecting comments on associated bidi… zhang.fei3
- Re: [mpls] Collecting comments on associated bidi… Lamberto Sterling