IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Sat, 23 April 2016 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D32812D508; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 10:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -13.617
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.617 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P5YzgeWeRloe; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 10:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9616612D1B7; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 10:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3848; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1461434270; x=1462643870; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=LlE5tkjIdjuP+vssVQSWrKrOjAMR7P47IrJ/pivdaiQ=; b=FtwE43mJWYfDJzPzwkvtJW99HcLhUH2gJeVxdExUXyCNdaBb2Cqaur1f DvRlrKV0+Gu0jUrExs49SjqZPyzC+NMe3u0daYkMON8S8AcgYiZZn8l5/ bkMLR3+Z/24yntlpunvEfQpDQ5juOV/8uWpxah8iiu0q9gTAW5Lbdygk+ s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AKAgDLthtX/4kNJK1egzhTfQa5bAENgXUXC4VsAhyBAzgUAQEBAQEBAWUnhEIBAQQBAQELFRExBgMLDgICAQgaAiYCAgIZDAsVEAIEAQ0FiCoOrkCQcAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAREEBHiJcIQPEQEcGIJqglYFh36HB4kKAY4TgWaETYhdjy4BHgEBQoIFG4FLbIdGNn8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,523,1454976000"; d="scan'208";a="265350476"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 23 Apr 2016 17:57:49 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (xch-rtp-015.cisco.com [64.101.220.155]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u3NHvnL9017100 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 23 Apr 2016 17:57:49 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 13:57:48 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 13:57:48 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label
Thread-Index: AQHRnYml/l4Oy2kisUCFQARxWDWjpw==
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 17:57:48 +0000
Message-ID: <D3412FA2.5C128%acee@cisco.com>
References: <571B29F8.1060301@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <571B29F8.1060301@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <BF322BEB696E35418A5B2494DBABB654@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/R1sUvwrs9Bg0zPJrqDMRMOQ2Qew>
Cc: "draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label@tools.ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 17:57:52 -0000

I support publication of this work. I have the following editorial
comments:

208,209c208,209
<    source routed label stacks.  Lets L_N-P denote the label to be used
<    to reach the node SID of LSR P.  Let L_A-Ln denote the label used for
---
>    source routed label stacks.  Let L_N-P3 denote the label to be used
>    to reach the node SID of LSR P3.  Let L_A-Ln denote the label used for
322c322
<    label stack.  In the example described in Section 3 it will result in
---
>    label stack.  In the example described in Section 3, it will result in
330c330
<    Section 3 the LSR P1 would poorly load-balance traffic on the
---
>    Section 3, the LSR P1 would poorly load-balance traffic on the
349c349
<    This option was discounted since there exist a number of hardware
---
>    This option was rejected since there are a number of hardware
351,352c351,352
<    Choosing this option can lead to a loss of load-balancing using EL in
<    a significant part of the network but that is a critical requirement
---
>    Choosing this option can lead to EL load-balancing interruptions in
>    a significant part of the network and that is a critical requirement
377c377
<    This option was discounted due to the existence of hardware
---
>    This option was rejected due to the existence of hardware
381c381
<    restrict the number of tunnels that can form a LSP and constrain the
---
>    restrict the number of LSRs that can form an LSP and constrain the
419c419
<    This option was discounted due to the significant change in label
---
>    This option was rejected due to the significant change in label
432c432
<    This option was discounted due to the significant change in label
---
>    This option was rejected due to the significant change in label


Thanks,
Acee 

On 4/23/16, 3:53 AM, "mpls on behalf of Loa Andersson"
<mpls-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of loa@pi.nu> wrote:

>Working Group,
>
>This is to initiate a two week working group last call on
>draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label.
>
>Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list (mpls@ietf.org)
>
>There are no IPR disclosures against this document.
>
>All the authors and contributors (with one exception) have stated on
>the working group mailing list that they are not aware of any other
>IPRs that relates to this draft.
>
>This working group last call ends May 12, 2016.
>
>
>/Loa
>for the MPLS wg chairs
>-- 
>
>
>Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
>Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
>Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
>
>_______________________________________________
>mpls mailing list
>mpls@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

v2.34.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status