Re: [mpls] mpls wg review and update of the draft-ietf-rtgwg-dt-encap
Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org> Fri, 18 November 2016 03:49 UTC
Return-Path: <nordmark@acm.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A931294B9; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 19:49:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.955
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.955 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hx9_znrcx60p; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 19:49:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from d.mail.sonic.net (d.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFD921293D6; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 19:49:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [31.133.136.204] (dhcp-88cc.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.136.204]) (authenticated bits=0) by d.mail.sonic.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id uAI3ni7Y012367 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 17 Nov 2016 19:49:45 -0800
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <b4eebdf9-8463-47fe-ff44-da8ad498a8f2@pi.nu>
From: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>
Message-ID: <57760232-8789-c072-e637-939b54f91fb5@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:49:44 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <b4eebdf9-8463-47fe-ff44-da8ad498a8f2@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVaza/870roZPczyl5MsmwjkBqaE5ORf3i0oenId3DnlEgIpSn3ydQlW3KeSJxXtGZvn2GjIYf+dvzwyKKSMBLE9jhgje+vpvAQ=
X-Sonic-ID: C;QJoaC0Kt5hGaYbmFuxn0og== M;Bna5C0Kt5hGaYbmFuxn0og==
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/R29bkhbOkF6KuOnZ05ELkB91z6Q>
Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-dt-encap@ietf.org, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] mpls wg review and update of the draft-ietf-rtgwg-dt-encap
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 03:49:50 -0000
On 11/18/16 12:25 PM, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> At the rtgwg meeting in Seoul today, it was reported that
> draft-ietf-rtgwg-dt-encap has been stable for some time. However it
> has been
> pointed out that MPLS is not very well covered.
>
> This is a request that people within need to mpls wg review the document
> and if possible supply text to improve the coverage of mpls. As Erik N
> said at the meeting "please send text".
In addition, it would be fine to add text which says "Encapsulations
which use MPLS need to also consider issue X; see details in RFCNNNN
section Y."
Thus we don't need to repeat text for issues that are already explained
somewhere else.
Thanks,
Erik
>
> Please send comments to authors, rtgwg and mpls wg mailing lists.
>
> /Loa
- [mpls] mpls wg review and update of the draft-iet… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] mpls wg review and update of the draft… Erik Nordmark