IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator labelindraft-kompella-mpls-entropy-label

Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net> Wed, 28 July 2010 12:52 UTC

Return-Path: <kireeti@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D109828C0E8 for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SD7u3XKmDB2G for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og112.obsmtp.com (exprod7og112.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.177]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2C028C163 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob112.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTFAoKSRMAul7k4d69DBx0uNiYzCAbhNX@postini.com; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:52:59 PDT
Received: from EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::c821:7c81:f21f:8bc7]) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::fc92:eb1:759:2c72%11]) with mapi; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:46:50 -0700
From: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>
To: Yong Lucy <lucyyong@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:46:49 -0700
Thread-Topic: [mpls] entropy label indicator labelindraft-kompella-mpls-entropy-label
Thread-Index: AcsuUvKQcoGG+EjLShydmNZTk1N4tA==
Message-ID: <5ED611B4-1534-4CA7-BCC8-A51AA174BF26@juniper.net>
References: "Your message of Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:24:02 BST." <4C4EEC02.2040202@cisco.com> <201007280737.o6S7bcXk090494@harbor.orleans.occnc.com> <04d401cb2e44$e45dfdd0$c7728182@china.huawei.com> <82522A95-8A16-4BB4-B0BC-F86A9A8F03E1@juniper.net> <000601cb2e4e$8b0ddf20$c7728182@china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <000601cb2e4e$8b0ddf20$c7728182@china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] entropy label indicator labelindraft-kompella-mpls-entropy-label
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:52:39 -0000

On Jul 28, 2010, at 05:15 , Yong Lucy wrote:

> Kireeti,
> 
> There is one technical reason to have one common ELI label value: for
> multicast packets.

How does one signal a multi-path p2mp LSP?

Kireeti.

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status