Re: [mpls] Resend: wglc for draft-ietf-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification

[Alexander Vainshtein <[e-mail]>]

Loa and the WG,
As one of the co-authors, I support progressing this draft.
>From my POV, the need for it has been demonstrated at the last EANTC event
where we have, for the 2nd time in a row, experienced the very
interoperability issue that this draft is supposed to eliminate.

At the same time, I would like to remind all that, as part of the WG
adoption call we have agreed to add the following text at the end of
Section 4 after adoption of the draft (see
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/yMQIR8Zadkx6X9faDnIwj-s8mW4):

"The Figures in Sections 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3 replace the corresponding
Figures in RFC 8029  Sections 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3 respectively. The
updated figures contain explicitly defined length."

>From my POV this should be done before the draft is sent to the IESG.

Regards,
Sasha Vainshtein





On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 10:49 AM Loa Andersson <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Working Group,
>
> re-sending with the correct subject.
>
> /Loa
>
> On 2019-05-07 13:35, Loa Andersson wrote:
> > Working Group,
> >
> > This is to initiate a two week working group last call on
> > draft-ietf-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification.
> >
> > Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list ([e-mail]).
> >
> > There are no IPR disclosures directly against draft-ietf-mpls-rfc8287-
> > len-clarification.
> >
> > All authors have stated on the working group mailing list that they
> > are unaware of any non-disclosed IPRs that relates to this document.
> >
> > This working group last call ends Tuesday May 21, 2019.
> >
> > /Loa
>
> --
>
>
> Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
> Senior MPLS Expert
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: [phone]
>