IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Wed, 18 May 2016 13:24 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F5E12D0BC; Wed, 18 May 2016 06:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F61xOnreC1xX; Wed, 18 May 2016 06:24:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x235.google.com (mail-oi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E668212B006; Wed, 18 May 2016 06:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x235.google.com with SMTP id k142so76125243oib.1; Wed, 18 May 2016 06:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wEgteKoEZqop+G0ZaFjaKqAUJTRGnJb0wma/Zx99H80=; b=Pw3VawFe2ODy20vG5ISCHWbBF28FqwfIyI6cwqDcKcqQg4dKcAg3tzCO06fZvOlP2X SOxWQnRS40a+atBKP4OuSrISk4yHZuA3FTOD1B/UrGGTrYOISIQHdgoVwfqhb2yN+ZT8 x8wtrSJW++f+b2wsjbcZDV5M3fxYzF5VgajxLSk++mnFyjXlgY6FW+snhRzbT3SAasX5 EYYDxAbsrHGNmhn1iowrc3eXlySeYaHDrbF9futdvBPe42qchBYC759bCR4B1z6phZ/t 7D/5LQz0fEMFpyxr6DFms9J9Ti+yacxlTmjI18LQBHE32uPES8dyxZOEMVvpZwkQ6aYX zsVQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wEgteKoEZqop+G0ZaFjaKqAUJTRGnJb0wma/Zx99H80=; b=e7cJuZp4Iv2riMQOP5UHckAmOr3ZIi/+rR2tl+nVmW19VXL9h5wnWPF4FompASyPbM z8JGAazSky1A1x8Ujt31Ld6cBfL6pXoNj6NS8yPTj3HL40UnS6vL7B96hS8IbbmYtWEF e7lF3CaPE0SAp0PV/a6aGpeEWDaOWvD6k5iXbNVNtIUKG+AQCug4JYAE3ct55RXs/Co4 kNi+T3y1SWv+PuciMfj2lBRZPJb7MQxaaSEULFD6krYytwR/RUU31mN+oY7pXnsGoR0V RUoMsoUgzJlQn4QBWKMVx5ltJz4XNt+c92wlf5vPNN76j4M1OsllMXarZmFuhyEe+OfG dQJQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUJf3vtTrmJfBxriA13uc2zvkm5BMZPcm4GGJb7xNEuayJonin1IOb1/HhlGv+/WkVrI8Rwb7HeM7tSrQ==
X-Received: by 10.157.13.227 with SMTP id 90mr4690723ots.79.1463577881265; Wed, 18 May 2016 06:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.231.106 with HTTP; Wed, 18 May 2016 06:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <729f6a0b-6222-7100-3b79-2291870d4421@pi.nu>
References: <729f6a0b-6222-7100-3b79-2291870d4421@pi.nu>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 09:24:21 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU0kenAK5q355++cgPZg7_UXM2Q4JOH_Hme-62off1SndA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c110014b6cdb705331dc757"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/RhQYdFAoAO_2nAYDx3LGPD-qiNU>
Cc: draft-saad-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, draft-saad-mpls-static-yang@ietf.org, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to adopt two document (mpls-static and mpls-base)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 13:24:44 -0000

Loa,

I support both of these drafts for adoption, they are a good basis for the
work.

Cheers,
Andy

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 6:01 AM, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:

>
> Working Group,
>
> This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-saad-mpls-static-
> yang-03 and draft-saad-mpls-base-yang-00 as MPLS working group
> documents.
>
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org) Please give a technical
> motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
> the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
>
> There are no IPR disclosures against either document. An IPR poll has
> been started in parallel to this adoption poll
>
> The working group adoption poll ends June 2, 2016, given that the IPR
> poll has concluded.
>
> /Loa
>
> MPLS wg co-chair.
> --
>
>
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status