Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution
xiao.min2@zte.com.cn Tue, 13 September 2022 06:42 UTC
Return-Path: <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B50ACC1527AA for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 23:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.998, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MLhXlPe6GHMN for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 23:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DF1EC1527A5 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 23:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4MRYn9611Hz8R049; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:42:53 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp02.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.201]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 28D6geIL065247; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:42:40 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from xiao.min2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp01[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:42:40 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:42:40 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2af963202660ffffffff805d52bc
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202209131442402053462@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmWWnGstWW2GqLvdEgW3fEj1qx9S5VD+h3WAO25E3hJjbw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 7c419233-7cba-1bb0-740d-34e09f149efe@pi.nu, DS0PR19MB650143C4F4C1B9BF3E60C888FC7A9@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com, bc67ab72-e36c-cd5f-27aa-0441c4ee093c@pi.nu, DS0PR19MB65019CECC654037542FC2588FC7E9@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com, VI1PR0701MB6991B4A8EEEB56202E4D377AEB439@VI1PR0701MB6991.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com, CAPOsKjFMbqbwMt5ETzTr_zbdk7r8ApkMsHwdo0UiQFFey++=Ww@mail.gmail.com, BL3PR11MB57310626CD47E373E9FD745BBF449@BL3PR11MB5731.namprd11.prod.outlook.com, 0459ad6f-958c-4cd3-2668-a0a88bf1d11d@joelhalpern.com, BL3PR11MB5731155791027C8154EB4B2CBF449@BL3PR11MB5731.namprd11.prod.outlook.com, 3a6fb958-42f8-7293-ce7b-2cecf59ed3ca@joelhalpern.com, BL3PR11MB5731A884F6E9325BD265AE0BBF449@BL3PR11MB5731.namprd11.prod.outlook.com, CA+RyBmWWnGstWW2GqLvdEgW3fEj1qx9S5VD+h3WAO25E3hJjbw@mail.gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
To: gregimirsky@gmail.com
Cc: rgandhi=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 28D6geIL065247
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-FangMail-Miltered: at cgslv5.04-192.168.250.137.novalocal with ID 6320266D.004 by FangMail milter!
X-FangMail-Envelope: 1663051373/4MRYn9611Hz8R049/6320266D.004/10.5.228.82/[10.5.228.82]/mse-fl2.zte.com.cn/<xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 6320266D.004/4MRYn9611Hz8R049
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/SCC0IVYsSt23FGz3vN-eqhQgMbA>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 06:42:58 -0000
Hi Greg, You misunderstand my choice, I selected A) “I support the MPLS Open DT bringing forward a single unified solution" [1], the same as yours. I just expressed my support on draft-jags-mpls-mna-hdr too, that's not contradictory to my choice. Best Regards, Xiao Min [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/t9cfGgnFsAd0-ogXMWQp0oi17ek/ ------------------Original------------------ From: GregMirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> To: Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) <rgandhi=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; Cc: mpls@ietf.org <mpls@ietf.org>; Date: 2022年09月13日 13:57 Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls Dear Jag, Rakesh, and Xiao Min,I feel confused. The way I understood the pool's question is whether the group supports standardizing a single solution document or whether each of proposed solutions can be standardized (WG Chairs, please correct me if I misunderstood your question). From your previous emails, it appears that you support the latter - possibly standardizing multiple data plane solutions. Could you please clarify. Also, I don't find in the poll question about which of the solutions, already proposed or to be proposed soon, to be standardized. It seems like being disciplined and following the scope of the questions will help us progress this work faster. Regards, Greg On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 12:34 AM Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) <rgandhi=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: Hi Joel, Yes, one solution. And we support progressing the draft-jags-mpls-mna-hdr as that solution. Thanks, Rakesh From: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Date: Monday, September 12, 2022 at 5:53 PM To: Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) <rgandhi@cisco.com>, Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com> Cc: mpls@ietf.org <mpls@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Then we agree that we want only one solution. I read the poll as being agnostic on the question of what the one solution would look like. Given that there are at least two solutions that seem to work (and are now quite similar) on the table, I would expect a fairly typical process for getting to one good solution. Yours, Joel On 9/12/2022 5:50 PM, Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) wrote: Hi Joel, Thanks for your comments. Please see inline with <RG>. From: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Date: Monday, September 12, 2022 at 5:41 PM To: Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) <rgandhi@cisco.com>, Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com> Cc: mpls@ietf.org <mpls@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution The phrasing in this sub-thread of messages seems a bit odd to me. Are you folks really saying you want to see two (or more) different solutions for MNA? That seems highly undesirable. <RG> We are saying - progressing the draft-jags-mpls-mna-hdr as a “single” MNA solution. <RG> Definitely not two or more different solutions for MNA. I read the poll as choosing between one solution and many solutions. You seem to be saying you read the poll as being between crafting something new and having multiple solutions?? <RG> We are saying - progressing one solution only, which is defined in draft-jags-mpls-mna-hdr. Thanks, Rakesh Yours, Joel On 9/12/2022 3:50 PM, Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) wrote: Hi WG Chairs, I support option (B) as progressing the draft-jags-mpls-mna-hdr (that is well-thought of by the co-authors) as a single solution for MNA. I do not support option (A) as new authors from the open DT team to take pieces from the draft and submit a new document. Thanks, Rakesh From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, 6 September 2022 at 19:50 To: mpls@ietf.org <mpls@ietf.org> Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, pals-chairs@ietf.org <pals-chairs@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org> Subject: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Dear MPLS WG and MPLS Open DT, Over the past months, the MPLS Open DT has reviewed several proposals for the packet encodings for the MNA solution. A compilation of the multiple solutions brought forward is present at https://trac.ietf.org/trac/mpls/wiki/MNADocumnets. We believe that currently there are two alternative ways to progress the MNA solution. One of them requires a single unified solution, and the other allows for individual solutions to progress independently. We expect any unified solution to document the pieces from the presented solutions that are discussed and agreed upon in the weekly MPLS Open DT meeting. The co-chairs for the working groups hosting the Open MPLS DT are polling the WG on their preference to move forward. Please respond with either: A) “I support the MPLS Open DT bringing forward a single unified solution" OR B) “I support progressing the individual solution(s) independently" We will allow this poll to run for two weeks (ending on Sept 19th). Regards, Tarek (for the MPLS Open DT co-chairs) _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
- [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Tarek Saad
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Joel Halpern
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Tarek Saad
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution tom petch
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Tarek Saad
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Yingzhen Qu
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution xiao.min2
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Gyan Mishra
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution tom petch
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Jaganbabu Rajamanickam
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Jisu Bhattacharya (jisu)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Joel Halpern
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Joel Halpern
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution xiao.min2
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution xiao.min2
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Jaganbabu Rajamanickam
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Jaganbabu Rajamanickam
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Jisu Bhattacharya (jisu)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution bruno.decraene
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution tom petch
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Zafar Ali (zali)
- [mpls] Poll results (was: Poll on way forward for… Tarek Saad