Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Fri, 22 March 2019 18:30 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F23131443; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qrkeHhmttOjy; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x535.google.com (mail-pg1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::535]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EE59131446; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x535.google.com with SMTP id g8so2090986pgf.2; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8mu4cgEjvGq4KAKJTNai8uIIPMolrXDCCKp6skXU0ZY=; b=hutbng0f6LwCW8GNJpJWokfHwim0fPA/PNQYFi06TK4xbh89XzRKnKHBdEfkDRHsYX EsiiFgaHqAiW5715Lfy0fhhUZnL3zFnAbjQnimeOBp1yB4Uc9sXqIEweUC+SksYCIPJU 0cuINzhzgiQhJpppccsG/mRdUPp1Y8Ga/91uX3zWfSeataJ0C8hKpflWAIn+sek/e+7l sqy3OtY8kiJuWxHkg0BmrQij/r1hvKUDrUXNxBZT6RxDK3hzNHvhqM47BLYjNrlmhqAM BTRs0gmryPUkJdrOPuTuLa4xYd6I6WOgqYa9lqnOQEMMq6kxi6akYVh3pStGRXnSPpT5 h0TQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8mu4cgEjvGq4KAKJTNai8uIIPMolrXDCCKp6skXU0ZY=; b=HskUtwibjBPTNwb5lm/0knya+dzBJyFbXeahyB/cCOUQXepKSf+lVjy6yXfqwuA9rh SesxDvs8KNnNLn3CE0EitOjqOkNSaIIZUKJr0dvYpd4DG6E9kqEBq5VmWrW+DTfLjyoa 5y+P7QXYoaDMlXoVL3dQVzsQ2BY7mPl4T2CbNsAbjzx2pcVaXoZBYfP9MAffbhh5Yh0l mn+PNOiOSVH2o7YkskUxtA6yny8W89T2ravn8IEuxNl45DHuvvaqILTBnvTN8ZessjnV Ddafp60kdQU7kxv1f7ycb0fMXxh3/oWFvS55I3jVzZ6TSzbdT6yoo29iGMozc2SY+XGa jo8Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXribyeu73qwazLvPE++aZ0DMRC8M4jihO8W5NgG52gy4R9yhu2 h+AEC5wa5UqtasjyiOEv9acGEIqHMVAGlCfga5BnJrWG
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxLuUn9rKPMx7i/bQw0aQLXuDVJSox1FlNahdPTUNDKGlic+ehUzxNXRVLUBSUP4VTYvQtZSPPffI6fjTPvt8s=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8205:: with SMTP id k5mr10370451pfi.86.1553279406035; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <LEJPR01MB0377736655954BBFFA0D429798430@LEJPR01MB0377.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE>
In-Reply-To: <LEJPR01MB0377736655954BBFFA0D429798430@LEJPR01MB0377.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE>
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:29:54 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTsZzV73V4jijVL9ZJx09S5kHkcfFfPHENCuSSfvSM7BBg@mail.gmail.com>
To: N.Leymann@telekom.de
Cc: IETF MPLS List <mpls@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003bd8250584b30b07"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/SUG2TFRLdfKRnSG8zUH-R9uAj1Q>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 18:30:09 -0000

Yes, I’m aware of the IPR that applies to
draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte.
And yes the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules.
IPR -- https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2559/

Regards,
-Pavan

On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 3:39 AM <N.Leymann@telekom.de>; wrote:

> Dear Working Group,
>
>
>
> We are currently preparing draft draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte for
> working group last call.
>
>
>
> Part of this preparation is to do an IPR poll.
>
>
>
> This mail is to start the IPR poll.
>
>
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to
> draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte?
>
>
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see
> RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
>
>
> There are no IPR disclosure directly against
> draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte.
>
> However, there is one IPR disclosure against the individual document
> draft-mtaillon-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte that preceded the working group
> document:
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2559/
>
>
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
> *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS WG mailing list.* The document
> will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from
> each author and contributor.
>
>
>
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
>    Nic
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>