IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Working Group adoption poll on draft-zzhang-mpls-rmr-multicast

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Thu, 11 July 2019 10:47 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932091200E3; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 03:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xovh37hJ_TZl; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 03:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C90412017D; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 03:47:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.8] (c83-250-135-99.bredband.comhem.se [83.250.135.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E8E233F5AF; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 12:47:25 +0200 (CEST)
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-zzhang-mpls-rmr-multicast@ietf.org" <draft-zzhang-mpls-rmr-multicast@ietf.org>
References: <60ac2769-c0f4-4a2e-27b2-103fefc1b475@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <e719049b-4af5-22f4-c4f1-5d4c09a26426@pi.nu>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 12:47:22 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <60ac2769-c0f4-4a2e-27b2-103fefc1b475@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/SVSjta-q0iB1UQueAg4CGgAGXCM>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Working Group adoption poll on draft-zzhang-mpls-rmr-multicast
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 10:47:31 -0000

Authors, Working Group,

I know we are in the cut-off period, I have been waiting to be able
to draft-ietf-mpls-rmr (but we are still missing a response from the
key author). I won't wait any long but will close this wgap.

This Working Group Adoption Poll is closed. We have a new working group
document. Can the authros please post draft-ietf-mpls-rmr-multicast-00
without any other changes than administrativia.

/Loa

On 2019-06-17 10:25, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
> 
> This is to start a two week poll on adopting
> draft-zzhang-mpls-rmr-multicast
> as a MPLS working group document.
> 
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical
> motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
> the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
> 
> We have done an IPR poll for this document. All the co-authors and
> contributors have responded to the IPR poll that they are unaware of any
> IPRs that relates to this draft.
> 
> The working group adoption poll ends June 30, 2019.
> 
> /Loa
> 
> mpls wg co-chair

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email