[mpls] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC5036 (5587)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 08 January 2019 22:12 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D50F12D7F8; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 14:12:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rUSzwY64PkeJ; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 14:12:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1FAD13115E; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 14:12:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 4841DB81DDA; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 14:12:24 -0800 (PST)
To: ramakrishnadtv@gmail.com, loa@pi.se, ina@juniper.net, rhthomas@cisco.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: db3546@att.com, iesg@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20190108221224.4841DB81DDA@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2019 14:12:24 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/SwU5R9TWfQ5Twf2ERc3favKXlqQ>
Subject: [mpls] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC5036 (5587)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2019 22:12:37 -0000
The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC5036, "LDP Specification". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5587 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Editorial Reported by: Ramakrishna Rao DTV <ramakrishnadtv@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2018-12-28 Held by: Deborah Brungard (IESG) Section: 2.6.2.2 Original Text ------------- "In Downstream Unsolicited advertisement mode, label mapping advertisements for all routes may be received from all LDP peers. When using Liberal Label retention, every label mappings received from a peer LSR is retained regardless of whether the LSR is the next hop for the advertised mapping..." Corrected Text -------------- "In Downstream Unsolicited advertisement mode, label mapping advertisements for all routes may be received from all LDP peers. When using Liberal Label retention, every label mapping received from a peer LSR is retained regardless of whether the LSR is the next hop for the advertised mapping..." Notes ----- s/mappings/mapping/ -------------------------------------- RFC5036 (draft-ietf-mpls-rfc3036bis-04) -------------------------------------- Title : LDP Specification Publication Date : October 2007 Author(s) : L. Andersson, Ed., I. Minei, Ed., B. Thomas, Ed. Category : DRAFT STANDARD Source : Multiprotocol Label Switching Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [mpls] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC5036 … RFC Errata System