Re: [mpls] [spring] should draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label be published as a RFC on the standards track?

Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com> Wed, 02 May 2018 13:29 UTC

Return-Path: <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B020126DCA; Wed, 2 May 2018 06:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.79
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=eci365.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M7sIe8ghTh-8; Wed, 2 May 2018 06:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.bemta5.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta5.messagelabs.com [195.245.231.153]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48B79126FB3; Wed, 2 May 2018 06:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [85.158.136.83] (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits)) by server-17.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 73/0E-08832-73DB9EA5; Wed, 02 May 2018 13:29:27 +0000
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrEJsWRWlGSWpSXmKPExsViovlDRdds78s ogz1nrS1OPz/FZrGtW9ni39w5zBbrj29isri1dCWrxfELvxkd2Dx2zrrL7rFkyU8mj1nT29gC mKNYM/OS8isSWDMuTnjJXHCusKJv5WW2BsaWgi5GLg4WgTZmiTsrNjCBOEIC/UwSs390s0A49 xgl+g/fZu1i5ORgE7CV2LT6LhuILSIgK3Ft20+wDmaBv4wSXXOmMIIkhAXKJa5O+MLexcgBVF QhcaDJHsK0kjhyDKyCRUBFYvaMLywgNq9AjMTpxlNgtpBAncSWS1/AajgFAiXONe8BW8UoICb x/dQaJhCbWUBc4taT+WC2hICAxJI955khbFGJl4//sULUJ0ncf7qQESKuKDHj3hx2CFtW4tL8 bkaQkyUEtjBJTHuzigUioSvxYepUZpA7JQSUJba8iIWoOcwoseTLMVaIuJbEpee6EOXZEq3fj kK15kjceXKRHaJ+EbNEZ/9NqONkJBbtv84EkdjOJvFk+RlGiC+TJU7M+cwCkXjMKLF+z0f2CY w6s5B8NwtoIbNAnsT/w16zwIEkKHFy5hMWiLCmxPpd+hDVihJTuh+yQ9gaEq1z5rIjiy9gZF/ FqFGcWlSWWqRrZKSXVJSZnlGSm5iZo2toYKqXm1pcnJiempOYVKyXnJ+7iRGYxuoZGBh3MO5p 9zvEKMnBpCTKqzzlZZQQX1J+SmVGYnFGfFFpTmrxIUYZDg4lCd6MPUA5waLU9NSKtMwcYEKFS Utw8CiJ8HrsAkrzFhck5hZnpkOkTjFachx6P6WHmeMcmHxyeVoPsxBLXn5eqpQ4ryHIPAGQho zSPLhxsKR/iVFWSpiXkYGBQYinILUoN7MEVf4VozgHo5IwL/NuoCk8mXklcFtfAR3EBHTQ56/ PQQ4qSURISTUwmsRf2eOhvvN2sltWxPo4iyN/3omc/vjYvLH62e0rNzmtan7rP+zKXJSYXPEn +15ZuSjD5Mlx/fWX3/w9yWBVrFSgbbir4c0DxyttjyP28Dx828lvomX0h3+Df79mn2Oh9b30n ymy5rxtnnvFD8TK8tYd+auprhgw33jWWoYZq+/Vl/DaBUcpsRRnJBpqMRcVJwIAyH9uyfUDAA A=
X-Env-Sender: Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-36.messagelabs.com!1525267763!118000724!1
X-Originating-IP: [52.41.248.36]
X-SYMC-ESS-Client-Auth: mailfrom-relay-check=pass
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 9.9.15; banners=ecitele.com,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 12167 invoked from network); 2 May 2018 13:29:25 -0000
Received: from us-west-2a.mta.dlp.protect.symantec.com (HELO EUR01-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) (52.41.248.36) by server-10.tower-36.messagelabs.com with AES256-SHA256 encrypted SMTP; 2 May 2018 13:29:25 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ECI365.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-ecitele-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=V2ym2YbwhHvQvpbfShDDndi04/uXnQCktkBXk2azUOs=; b=OIlHVi++4vzBQ/5z8ybcpyI4SAi1KnioVRfVEa7XXiJIdRJVaCyu8/is0OBLXeEfzVGxQgSY6rnwJF6Z/j2zVELP7hIqiy9Q2Zu7tC+kGhrt0I1DqEZvS+RhKQbLWdeYVzDah1fAzG+Oiwo1bjhxxlM5derTYtTZ93GiEa9ubFQ=
Received: from AM2PR03MB0962.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.161.129.144) by AM2PR03MB0708.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.161.19.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.715.18; Wed, 2 May 2018 13:29:22 +0000
Received: from AM2PR03MB0962.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::30c6:bf83:b0e6:ef0e]) by AM2PR03MB0962.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::30c6:bf83:b0e6:ef0e%4]) with mapi id 15.20.0715.018; Wed, 2 May 2018 13:29:22 +0000
From: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
CC: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "mpls-ads@ietf.org" <mpls-ads@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label@ietf.org>, "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [spring] [mpls] should draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label be published as a RFC on the standards track?
Thread-Index: AQHT4el6ZytZW4Lkx0ewU7n78NEq7aQcZ3uAgAAHt6A=
Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 13:29:22 +0000
Message-ID: <AM2PR03MB096292FC4315B4F9C6F0C23B9D800@AM2PR03MB0962.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <a3dbc94b-061c-8eb8-7302-3a60f3db4a3f@pi.nu> <CAA=duU3Xc3BvYT1cmVN97vsEYQMsmm6kGqZaibuGOr6QrX42_w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU3Xc3BvYT1cmVN97vsEYQMsmm6kGqZaibuGOr6QrX42_w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.234.241.1]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM2PR03MB0708; 7:A9HTu8OCWIlTtKrUjrMGoNR1y/NvUc3jm0UdbDolasqOJXMXTiN/Kfup39WhrQhKjhf8/cE7M0y5K1cPQaKZksWoxchlSetTUYaokNQhKBBZXnV9NXNEZLmtJGcP3xj4/vWEPjEWzhogAE+rtbLFr0A+Ic8jtaMSD7Ecd5jG2F9rCZGczZ90pnrucIAN95dgq3h1n9miNAhM+qX9D9dcUc2+7Aeh9m1rYNpCGrVVSghLz+Afj88ktLrvQKe6B9FN
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(48565401081)(5600026)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:AM2PR03MB0708;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM2PR03MB0708:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM2PR03MB070815AD05B7E25FA96AD2E19D800@AM2PR03MB0708.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(28532068793085)(120809045254105)(21748063052155)(279101305709854);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040522)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3231254)(944501410)(52105095)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(6055026)(6041310)(20161123562045)(20161123560045)(20161123564045)(20161123558120)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:AM2PR03MB0708; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:AM2PR03MB0708;
x-forefront-prvs: 06607E485E
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(39380400002)(366004)(376002)(39850400004)(396003)(346002)(189003)(199004)(252514010)(6116002)(790700001)(33656002)(2906002)(53936002)(68736007)(39060400002)(2900100001)(3280700002)(54906003)(6246003)(97736004)(3660700001)(316002)(66066001)(11346002)(446003)(72206003)(476003)(486006)(5660300001)(5250100002)(966005)(478600001)(53546011)(106356001)(7736002)(74316002)(99286004)(59450400001)(606006)(105586002)(76176011)(186003)(6506007)(86362001)(25786009)(4326008)(14454004)(102836004)(26005)(6306002)(19609705001)(229853002)(9686003)(54896002)(3846002)(8936002)(81156014)(8676002)(6436002)(81166006)(236005)(6916009)(55016002)(7696005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM2PR03MB0708; H:AM2PR03MB0962.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ecitele.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: JxDaLcn+PzZ6v0s22QNpL+3qhmke5pFOqGneUcNqJrducFsXgl4tCrtzyWSmoGMHgv86jjyLnY7I8HITSy/CShus4NpeKOGzVh9ZNqG2/gbQjJdxQOl38Czu7thmyPfpaGl1ilgTFz45IGHHxA5GvIc2WP6st4g89AfFoJ7/tIFP2VsnrYgh+H+tfZG4OyZN
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AM2PR03MB096292FC4315B4F9C6F0C23B9D800AM2PR03MB0962eurp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: a71c8d89-7be6-49d8-541b-08d5b030b753
X-OriginatorOrg: ecitele.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a71c8d89-7be6-49d8-541b-08d5b030b753
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 May 2018 13:29:22.2622 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2c514a61-08de-4519-b4c0-921fef62c42a
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM2PR03MB0708
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/T4IfoL9-ZrL8XE9qAj_eD7ry4Mg>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [spring] should draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label be published as a RFC on the standards track?
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 13:29:32 -0000

Loa and all,
+1.

Regards,
Sasha

Office: +972-39266302
Cell:      +972-549266302
Email:   Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com

From: spring [mailto:spring-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andrew G. Malis
Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 4:01 PM
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org; mpls-ads@ietf.org; draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] [mpls] should draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label be published as a RFC on the standards track?

Loa,

There’s plenty of RFC 2119 language in the draft, so I support making this standards track.

Cheers,
Andy


On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 3:44 AM, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu<mailto:loa@pi.nu>> wrote:
Working Group,

February 1st the MPLS working Group requested that draft-ietf-mpls-
spring-entropy-label should be published as an Informational RFC.

During the RTG Directorate and AD reviews the question whether the
document should instead be published as a RFC on the Standards Track
has been raised.

The decision to make the document Informational was taken "a long time
ago", based on discussions between the authors and involving the
document shepherd, on the wg mailing list. At that point it we were
convinced that the document should be progressed as an Informational
document.

It turns out that there has been such changes to the document that we
now would like to request input from the working group if we should make
the document a Standards Track RFC.

Daniele's RTG Directorate review can be found at at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-08-rtgdir-lc-ceccarelli-2018-02-21/

All the issues, with the exception whether it should be Informational
or Standards track, has been resolved as part AD review.

If the document is progressed as a Standard Tracks document then we
also need to answer the question whether this is an update RFC 6790.

This mail starts a one week poll (ending May 9) to see if we have
support to make the document a Standards Track document. If you support
placing it on the Standards Track also consider if it is an update to
RFC 6790.

Please send your comments to the MPLS wg mailing list ( mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org> ).

/Loa
for the mpls wf co-chairs

PS

I'm copying the spring working group on this mail.
--


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu<mailto:loa@pi.nu>
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls


___________________________________________________________________________

This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information which is 
CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received this 
transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then delete the original 
and all copies thereof.
___________________________________________________________________________