[mpls] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-mpls-retire-ach-tlv-01.txt
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sat, 08 June 2013 21:34 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BDCA21F90F1 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Jun 2013 14:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.585
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.585 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nH81QGluC4KG for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Jun 2013 14:34:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (asmtp1.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.248]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB3521F8CDD for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Jun 2013 14:34:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r58LYMjQ011859 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Jun 2013 22:34:22 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r58LYLUR011840 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Jun 2013 22:34:22 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: mpls@ietf.org
References: <20130608204848.6462.27686.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130608204848.6462.27686.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2013 22:34:17 +0100
Message-ID: <0c8901ce648f$ee0eeea0$ca2ccbe0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHLO72PDyb6MLWQlEYNsNhAwl315pkyoLeA
Content-Language: en-gb
Subject: [mpls] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-mpls-retire-ach-tlv-01.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2013 21:34:29 -0000
Hi, Only change is a nit pointed out by Jia. Thanks, Adrian > -----Original Message----- > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] > Sent: 08 June 2013 21:49 > To: Adrian Farrel; Stewart Bryant > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-mpls-retire-ach-tlv-01.txt > > > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-mpls-retire-ach-tlv-01.txt > has been successfully submitted by Adrian Farrel and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Filename: draft-ietf-mpls-retire-ach-tlv > Revision: 01 > Title: Retiring TLVs from the Associated Channel Header of the MPLS > Generic Associated Channel > Creation date: 2013-06-08 > Group: mpls > Number of pages: 5 > URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-retire-ach-tlv- > 01.txt > Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-retire-ach-tlv > Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-retire-ach-tlv-01 > Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-retire-ach-tlv-01 > > Abstract: > The MPLS Generic Associated Channel (G-ACh) is a generalization of > the applicability of the Pseudowire (PW) Associated Channel Header > (ACH). RFC 5586 defines the concept of TLV constructs that can be > carried in messages on the G-ACh by placing them in the ACH between > the fixed header fields and the G-ACh message. These TLVs are called > ACH TLVs > > No Associated Channel Type yet defined uses an ACH TLV. Furthermore, > it is believed that handling TLVs in hardware introduces significant > problems to the fast-path, and since G-ACh messages are intended to > be processed substantially in hardware, the use of ACH TLVs is > undesirable. > > This document updates RFC 5586 by retiring ACH TLVs and removing the > associated registry. > > > > > The IETF Secretariat
- [mpls] FW: New Version Notification for draft-iet… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] FW: New Version Notification for draft… Hejia (Jia)