[mpls] Corection - IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Fri, 08 April 2016 10:12 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2EC612D831; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 03:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X7rN4KlRouHU; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 03:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7BD912D82D; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 03:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.10.2.96] (unknown [190.111.246.165]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10DE918013C8; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 12:12:46 +0200 (CEST)
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <5706AF5A.5070108@pi.nu>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <57078417.3070700@pi.nu>
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 18:12:39 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5706AF5A.5070108@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/UE_uIdEn0K7h9Rh71RW0ncFCz3c>
Subject: [mpls] Corection - IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 10:12:52 -0000

WG,

Sorry I had a cut and paste error in the two first paragraphs of this
mail, it should have read:

   The authors of draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp has told us that
   the document is ready for working group last call.

   We will do an IPR poll prior to the start of wglc.

I apologize for the mistake!

/Loa



On 2016-04-08 03:04, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> The authors of draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp has told us that
> the document is ready to be considered for working adoption.
>
> The document been through MPLS-RT review. We will do an IPR poll
> prior to the start of the adoption poll.
>
> This mail starts the IPR poll.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-app-aware-tldp?
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> There is one IPR disclosure filed directly against this document.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The
> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
> received from each author and contributor.
>
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>
> /Loa
> mpls wg co-chair