Re: [mpls] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10: (with COMMENT)

[Lizhong <[e-mail]>]

Stephen, George,
Thanks, will update accordingly.

Regards
Lizhong

> 在 2015年10月1日，05:19，Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]> 写道：
> 
> 
> 
>> On 30/09/15 19:50, George Swallow (swallow) wrote:
>> Lizhong, Stephen,
>> 
>> Perhaps less in more!
>> 
>> 
>>  Destination Address Offset: the offset in octets from the top-of-stack
>>  to the destination address entry.
> 
> That might be better yes. Maybe with a forward pointer to the 4.x
> sections that clarify it.
> 
> S
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Lizhong –
>> 
>> There are several places in the draft where the term "destination address” should be "destination address entry”
>> 
>> It would also be good to add a column to the table on page 6 indicating the size of each entry
>> 
>> Null              4
>> 
>> IPv4      8
>> 
>> IPv6    20
>> 
>> George
>> 
>> From: Lizhong Jin <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
>> Date: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 at 11:57 AM
>> To: Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
>> Cc: The IESG <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, mpls-chairs <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, "[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
>> Subject: Re: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10: (with COMMENT)
>> 
>> Hi Stephen,
>> See inline below. Thanks.
>> 
>> Lizhong
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>> Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10: No Objection
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> 
>> 
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>> 
>> 
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> 
>> - 3.2: The description of the destination address offset isn't
>> clear to me. If this is some common thing in MPLS though, that's
>> fine. If not, maybe it'd be worth being clearer here.
>> (It does become clear later though, so this is a nit.)
>> 
>> [Lizhong] I read several times, and try to make it more clear as below:
>> 
>> Destination Address Offset: an offset (octets) to indicate the
>>      position of the Relayed Address Entry which is also the
>> 
>>      destination address of the Reply or Relayed Reply message.
>> 
>>      E.g., to point the first entry on the top of the Stack of
>> 
>>      Relayed Addresses will have offset of 0, and to point to
>> 
>>      the second entry will have offset of the length of the first entry.
>> 
>>