[mpls] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-05: (with COMMENT)

["Benoit Claise" <[e-mail]>]

Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Did the WG consider updating RF C3209?

OLD:

   The node SHOULD be prepared to
   forward packets carrying the assigned label prior to sending the RESV
   message.

NEW:

   The node SHOULD be prepared to
   forward packets carrying the assigned label prior to sending the RESV
   message. When an ingress LSR receives an RESV message, it
MAY/SHOULD/MUST 
   invoke the LSP Self-ping procedures [this-RFC-to-be] to verify
   that forwarding state has been installed on all downstream nodes.