IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Resend: MPLS WG poll on making draft-ietf-mpls-rmr an Experimental RFC

Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com> Tue, 12 January 2021 20:30 UTC

Return-Path: <huubatwork@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 642233A118E; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:30:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.36
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.36 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, GB_FREEMAIL_DISPTO=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.262, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bMweKEWTJ5mf; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:30:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62f.google.com (mail-ej1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11A073A1189; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:30:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id ga15so5379126ejb.4; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:30:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=reply-to:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :disposition-notification-to:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5nnfQYgMd4uaglo9kV/uCiRMUXTowdkEY4cHp1fL6uM=; b=uFzrUyRl5JWqPiirGbsTG5mDzngWRKrca0R56Wx9QpJAkz8OyML0d/07Sz8C/qnX3U DFA4WTVbeIQdrp++/OsH0gsNREM+kLdqTzwd4X0RJ2lCDyCaftU/zqjcuqlQH6gLGXwP 84xH+kliGLHI4oPscPKpkQ3//siIcFJirtYGvKL+ml009/XHuzwh8OxDH7HhJMfSNten 0L9C+X4MVKLiUX1Q/mmue2li2rDiuA39LEBrvyKVYMWgslwfFH688ok4mBS+VUF9ojG8 q13B/oDl0tQYB9K/EvBr/tpSMF+6uYtZHPyyHxOeyqJXG32UpZYLSd+WS5hl5YAw2Rce UJSQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:subject:to:cc:references:from :message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5nnfQYgMd4uaglo9kV/uCiRMUXTowdkEY4cHp1fL6uM=; b=fooKsjhEwQFxkeOOD20KoYUWDdsJcWBaujfdy1sVrfkPS0NJskyd2QjIViXD+jyHUq MgdjRTcJO/WhzavexMLPa7k+yJ/LrLgg2zykX+COaEhtqSFekbsNe2q3lK4XQPkBy7UU KodOu1tf1kPi2kzI/x1yRHCM7qejtL6ubSVVfZceAk/708tXm3udpO9RKI/kIHpIkADC XV8+aLxat+KyLR311aR0VjyD2WrkOsxtbSa6Czm4YhuCHr+dxTzA+OkaBUKw9NVNwFYx PNLXQcs/vGkt3oSPls+dOjNvJqsPbwJCCNg8OWBkL04C9cZrROi25vDTPTbN57u5/eZ2 1BkA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532HNRMfYWkEdojyTspg21Sdb5u54463MGN0ITS4/49bBChMZcRM pdiITL1UQEqb51v5K7Bz1J3WS9KVilQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJweoUDzzJE+u+iH/aINHFqKO378GvTRBYQWAgGCq0hMg/IfHvUePGe/0r2tjHsFnGFc9u3mZw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6606:: with SMTP id b6mr393008ejp.151.1610483434351; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:30:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from McAsterix.local ([2a02:a211:8e81:2e00:10ce:433e:5925:5d3b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r24sm1940887edc.21.2021.01.12.12.30.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:30:33 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: huubatwork@gmail.com
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-rmr@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-rmr@ietf.org>
Cc: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <1b7d7573-d3d6-6f62-001b-998a6e8e65f7@pi.nu> <f70bf42b-3960-5142-12c7-2d607d1ad9f3@pi.nu>
From: Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <39564395-b2d2-36d2-8de9-87126a0a2212@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 21:30:32 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f70bf42b-3960-5142-12c7-2d607d1ad9f3@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/VdKYPVK8CRoWWIZ6IBWxrodklPg>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Resend: MPLS WG poll on making draft-ietf-mpls-rmr an Experimental RFC
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 20:30:37 -0000

Hej Loa,

You wrote:

> Please respond to the following questions.
> 
> If draft-ietf-mpls-rmr were made an Experimental document
> 
> 
> - do you think draft-ietf-mpls-rmr is needed and will actually be
>     deployed?

I think it is not needed, there is already RFC8227 which is
deployed widely.

> - do you have the cycles to contribute to progress and review the
>     document?

I don't have and will not seek cycles to progress this document.

> - are there interest to progress the document in this fashion?

No.

Best regards, Huub.


-- 
================================================================
Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email