[mpls] Re: IPR poll on draft-mb-mpls-ioam-dex
Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Tue, 03 September 2024 18:37 UTC
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60776C17C884; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 11:37:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DSUVQZQ2yjDU; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 11:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com (mail-wr1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C657C11D366; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 11:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-374c3400367so2302567f8f.2; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 11:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1725388627; x=1725993427; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3GYypRVyFnXapNYK+niNv3ckX1+CsX3g/bw6yQU4+sc=; b=Q5ZzFvgQ4YI31cevhc1pYkOW4rOWePoJjecQygwpAjwHz/MTzrL9VzcmNjKUaWTt3f e0uRDxbYPafBgWzoVcB5H9uG/mmwNGGItkT/6I0eS8B/a5FkUVL8DL8DpVH1stwRHUNo xPLL0AodyyLTbyz8DYg91OoHZhlo8+FTOD73nMeatR5D/ov/xa24Tf11bKJGfT+CKXEt 4Hj0CaJPCqzd43POlS/C9NPfgOayLM2DBP8P7J7QML89aigrJdSABwXXfg/jLAhs2+pg QzeD09BNQKAOqmqZ1PMeLAEL62pQZuqMkxkTSmPj+CPstPomtnRfj/lJmDc1VNBmjF5X T7rw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1725388627; x=1725993427; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=3GYypRVyFnXapNYK+niNv3ckX1+CsX3g/bw6yQU4+sc=; b=NOZe5VCViG1819e1nkRgVA1KyKld5QmjnRT1vYP6prczj3vvqRhhhzw3KgY9qRNrpM txv+gIue0yoFGxWU2vzlf5m0ntIJgS9Wp7pQMawrFZaG9s8rS5bfdJ3ZdQ0EEThh1R+C 28wzezVH6caJ3Fwfe6NgcO+ojvAaUqZMl62W+e4CscIz8abne8SXsua0UCnHN3bFVK/A TYFXcZdyTpcXKOuUXfQ1c9WihaAltaws3b0QR4Q9p4Shq5uyAaea+7yj+tMpPhQY8Rup IRFpVOQEY07VNeeV13QF9UKR80Ev10BvAOXK6naaiN+VtPtZlxKciaQbD9/I7rVe3kNK NM6Q==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUfhr8uGGyyJe2IBZdMDIgjbSKQhvPTjWuYjMGARiY/WfRt/89seIM2me/TmrIyBvhPIz1ZW9Lcl3gJJs8ntX0xndYHNueT@ietf.org, AJvYcCVWsVAWpEPjAJwAGCgY/vYpuzIWPrUf+FwsDybMnOpa7JlL1j5fdX4E31hy8MBVK7yaecofXmEJ0NpYepk=@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyLpgUqgn2PeZY8yQbr31DaDpxxk361zgXdkw75/3lRv+WkRVzp aBl23pCPybmCsD3G4TQkfuhyIORDxTAXkdCr44IQwWIJ2RK+ihcXuyDNC1gE9bPns73ukzXuA5N 6BwdV/SFaT626Mbq1cphXYlEloF4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHEU7b1DFuoGZ83g6nkDjx9HmboKyoSQn5mx3ARMwQc0RAj23CcwnPneVlSKCBN9vafzDlyTuLFtS+BJEWRod0=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:e791:0:b0:374:bec7:8f with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-374bec700f2mr9393818f8f.28.1725388627096; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 11:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BEZP281MB2008556A0A58CD57D7A530FF98932@BEZP281MB2008.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <BEZP281MB2008556A0A58CD57D7A530FF98932@BEZP281MB2008.DEUP281.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 11:36:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmU3A+NynN1o7=U7E_u0qLp=Wsyja4EXSdZnAHxeRtnsrw@mail.gmail.com>
To: N.Leymann@telekom.de
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000037bfc706213b58aa"
Message-ID-Hash: DBMUGULIOFWEWPPBIU6U24BWCRPTOB2S
X-Message-ID-Hash: DBMUGULIOFWEWPPBIU6U24BWCRPTOB2S
X-MailFrom: gregimirsky@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: mpls@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@ietf.org, draft-mb-mpls-ioam-dex@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [mpls] Re: IPR poll on draft-mb-mpls-ioam-dex
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/Vf2_iTnrVo19e1ZbPOIgNcXvzLQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>
As a co-author, I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Regards, Greg On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 6:31 AM <N.Leymann@telekom.de> wrote: > Hi Working Group and authors, > > > > This email initiates an IPR poll for draft-mb-mpls-ioam-dex in > anticipation of its Working Group adoption poll. > > > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to the draft identified above? > > Please state either: > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" > > or > > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > > > > If your answer is yes, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF > IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? > > Please state either: > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" > > or > > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > > > > If your answer no, please provide any additional details you think > appropriate. > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the > above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are > aware of any relevant IPR. > > > > **The response needs to be sent to the MPLS WG mailing list.** > > > > This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been > received from each author. > > Note, currently there is no IPR disclosure listed against this document. > > > > If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed > as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the > IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of > IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in > any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more > information, please see the RFCs listed above and > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. > > > > The authors/contributors that we expect responses from are: > > - Greg Mirsky > - Mohamed Boucadair > - Tony Li > > > > Regards > > > > Nic (for the MPLS chairs) > > >
- [mpls] IPR poll on draft-mb-mpls-ioam-dex N.Leymann
- [mpls] Re: IPR poll on draft-mb-mpls-ioam-dex Tony Li
- [mpls] Re: IPR poll on draft-mb-mpls-ioam-dex Greg Mirsky
- [mpls] Re: IPR poll on draft-mb-mpls-ioam-dex mohamed.boucadair