Re: [mpls] nits and question on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-02

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sat, 11 February 2017 08:26 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F2E127071; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 00:26:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oal-jAB1YnuW; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 00:26:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F9731293FD; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 00:26:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (unknown [112.204.169.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E9CB18013D1; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 09:26:13 +0100 (CET)
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <881fae47-dfd0-1cfb-0287-4338a030195c@pi.nu>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <676278bc-ad01-8f2f-0ef5-55f35cd5fc93@pi.nu>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 16:26:08 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <881fae47-dfd0-1cfb-0287-4338a030195c@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/VrtauDL37p6M0E1wQqj-mloIgW8>
Cc: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping@ietf.org>, Nobo Akiya <noboakiya24@gmail.com>, "Nagendra Kumar Nainar \(naikumar\)" <naikumar@cisco.com>, hannes@juniper.net
Subject: Re: [mpls] nits and question on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-02
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 08:26:21 -0000

Folks,

Unless I missed something there has been no responses to this!

/Loa

On 2017-02-04 11:54, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group, authors,
>
> I had a quick look at  draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-02, I have a few
> small nits and questions for the authors.
>
> 1. FEC is a well know abbreviation in MPLS context, but it is not
> well-know in wider IETF context. It needs to be expanded at first
> occurrence.
>
> 2. We have early allocation for this document, can you place the
> following not in the IANA section in section 10.1.
>
> "Note to the RFC Editor (please remove before publication): IANA has
>  made early allocation for sub-type 34, 35 and 35. The early allocation
>  expires 2017-09-15."
>
> And then we create a "#Protocol" sub-registry in  "Multi-Protocol Label
> Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters" We will
> need to define allocation policies and code point range. IMHO the policy
> should be "Standards Action" and the code range 0-255.
>
> And a last question, should BGP-LS be in that registry?
>
> /Loa

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64