Re: [mpls] Progressing Resdience Time Measurement draft

Hi,

	As a active member of NTP protocol working group.

	I would like to know how this draft is helping NTP to improve clock synchronization accuracy ?
	I am sure NTP is well written to take care of delay in the network. 
	Does it makes sense to modify time protocol messages by other protocols ?

	I am not convinced this draft is going to help NTP anyway. 

	So I am not for it till now. I don't have agreement with this draft as of now.
	I am ready to get convinced, if I get answers for above two questions.

Thanks & Regards
Anil S N

"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send" - Jon Postel

-----Original Message-----
From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant
Sent: 15 December 2015 15:41
To: Loa Andersson; Gregory Mirsky; mpls-chairs@ietf.org; mpls@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] Progressing Resdience Time Measurement draft

Loa

This is something of a crossover draft with the  work of the TICTOC/NTP folks so they should also be asked to comment.

Stewart

On 15/12/2015 03:23, Loa Andersson wrote:
>
> Working Group and authors,
>
> <chair hat off>
> As a matter of fact I believe this document should be progressed.
> <chair hat on>
> This draft has been a working group document since early August, but 
> there has been no discussion on the document on the wg mailing list.
>
> There are of course two ways if interpreting this.
> - there is total agreement on the draft
> - there is no intrest in the draft
>
> I have no basis to decide which is the case.
>
> Can we plese have at least a few (non-author) comments on the mailing 
> list if it is time to start the wglc.
>
> /Loa
> mpls wg co-chair
>
> On 2015-12-15 07:21, Gregory Mirsky wrote:
>> Dear Chairs of the MPLS WG,
>>
>> authors of the Residence Time Measurement in MPLS Network draft 
>> believe that all comments received during the WG adoption call been addressed.
>> Thus, authors would like to ask the WG Chairs to consider WG LC as 
>> the next step.
>>
>>                  Regards,
>>
>>                                  Greg
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls