[mpls] Update on status of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm

"BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com> Fri, 27 May 2016 21:33 UTC

Return-Path: <db3546@att.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C5412D543; Fri, 27 May 2016 14:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id emvZI1QKB2M5; Fri, 27 May 2016 14:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59E6712D17E; Fri, 27 May 2016 14:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049287.ppops.net []) by m0049287.ppops.net-00191d01. ( with SMTP id u4RLSZad003958; Fri, 27 May 2016 17:33:03 -0400
Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com []) by m0049287.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 236x2x8d9r-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 27 May 2016 17:33:03 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost []) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u4RLX1vC016771; Fri, 27 May 2016 17:33:02 -0400
Received: from mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com []) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u4RLWuPC016696 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 27 May 2016 17:32:58 -0400
Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAE.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAE.itservices.sbc.com []) by mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Fri, 27 May 2016 21:32:47 GMT
Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com ([]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAE.ITServices.sbc.com ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0294.000; Fri, 27 May 2016 17:32:46 -0400
From: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Update on status of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm
Thread-Index: AdG4Xq4qdqKxln6NTQ+y7KFiUel05Q==
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 21:32:45 +0000
Message-ID: <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C85297405F@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C85297405FMISOUT7MSGUSRDE_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-05-27_12:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1604210000 definitions=main-1605270243
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/WTW6jiNYHBiHtzzQhi7cF8GjjGg>
Cc: "draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm.all@tools.ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] Update on status of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 21:33:07 -0000


I've returned this document to the Working Group. Based on Dave Sinicrope's review (for the Routing Area Directorate) and my review, we identified quite a few changes to the document, including the addition of a new section on manageability. We will continue to work with you on the document.

I also strongly encourage the working group to initiate work on a solution (I don't see any solution drafts). There is no reason not to be doing a solution in parallel with the problem statement and requirements if the working group is interested in this problem and it will help to polish the requirements. I would like to see a solution document being progressed before publishing a requirements RFC.

Much thanks to Alessandro for holding the pen on these edits - he will upload the latest version for you to work on.

Good weekends-