[mpls] Update to the bullets on the first page of my review of draft-song-mpls-extension-header-09

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Mon, 29 August 2022 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F63C1526E7; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 09:14:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wfwFsKGt7_jX; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 09:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1BACC15257E; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 09:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [83.227.6.201] (c-c906e353.020-236-73746f24.bbcust.telenor.se [83.227.6.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB87D368526; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 18:14:10 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <98356ad3-ec52-3a5c-ee31-1ee604d4b5db@pi.nu>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 18:14:10 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0
Content-Language: en-CA
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-song-mpls-extension-header@ietf.org" <draft-song-mpls-extension-header@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/Wdv_CYEwaq8VmADiQMQSlbUSX8I>
Subject: [mpls] Update to the bullets on the first page of my review of draft-song-mpls-extension-header-09
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 16:14:23 -0000

Folks,

I just sent out a mail with my review of 
draft-song-mpls-extension-header-09.

It was very quickly pointed that I have a bunch of typos in the three 
bullets on the first page. The three bullets should have been:

•  I’m concerned about the inclusion of text on  “accessing the
    original protocol type and payload” in this document. Accessing
    protocol types (except for the first nibble) and payload is out of
    scope for MPLS, and thus for MNA.

•  I’m still concerned that we are not considering the processing order
    between NAIs. I believe that for NAIs using post stack data only the
    EHs could be inserted in the right order after the HEH. However, what
    if the NAI relies on ISD ancillary data; and that NAI must be
    processed after one of the post stack data NAI, but before another?
    How is that handled?

•  The authors have started the process of transforming this into an MNA
    document, but the transformation is incomplete.


Sorry about this!

/Loa


-- 
Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64