Re: [mpls] Seeking WG and chairs feedback on LDP/mLDP Yang doc split [Re: A quick update on LDP/mLDP Yang model (draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mldp-yang)]

["Kamran Raza (skraza)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Loa,

1. We expect LDP document to be little bigger than mLDP as it sets the
base for both LDP and mLDP.
2. Yes, both documents will be made related where mLDP one being dependent
on LDP document with proper x-ref.

Rgds.
‹
Kamran

On 2016-10-18, 8:22 AM, "Loa Andersson" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>Folks,
>
>One useful piece of information is what the relative size of the to
>documents would be. If we come tp som sort of "equal size" documents
>I see no problem splitting the current document.
>
>I would advice adding some info to both documents on the relationship
>between the documents.
>
>/Loa
>
>On 2016-10-13 02:08, Santosh Esale wrote:
>> The present document which is around 115 pages long is only expected to
>> get bigger as we add more operational states in the upcoming revision.
>> Please
>> let us know your comments and suggestions.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Santosh (on behalf of authors)
>> On 10/11/16, 12:07 PM, "mpls on behalf of Kamran Raza (skraza)"
>> <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> on behalf of
>> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hello MPLS WG and WG chairs,
>>
>>     [Refer to our email two weeks ago]
>>
>>     Keeping in view some of the MPLS-RT review comments and the current
>>     size of the join document (draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mldp-yang), we, the
>>     authors, are thinking of splitting the LDP/mLDP Yang model into two
>>     separate documents ­ one for LDP and other for mLDP - and would like
>>     to get WG and chairs feedback on this.
>>
>>     Please comment/advise accordingly.
>>     Rgds.
>>     ‹
>>     Kamran
>>     (on behalf of authors)
>>
>>     From: Syed Kamran Raza <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>     Date: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 1:14 PM
>>     To: "[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>" <[e-mail]
>>     <mailto:[e-mail]>>, "[e-mail]
>>     <mailto:[e-mail]>" <[e-mail]
>>     <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>     Cc: "[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>"
>>     <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>,
>>     "[e-mail]
>>     <mailto:[e-mail]>"
>>     <[e-mail]
>>     <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>     Subject: [mpls] A quick update on LDP/mLDP Yang model
>>     (draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mldp-yang)
>>
>>     Hello MPLS WG and WG chairs,
>>
>>     This email is to give a quick update on the current work being done
>>     on  the IETF LDP/mLDP Yang draft (draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mldp-yang-00).
>>
>>       * Multi-vendor team is meeting twice a month to progress on the
>>         model:
>>           o Cisco, Juniper, Huawei, Ciena, Ericsson, Nokia
>>       * The current focus of the team is to:
>>           o address remaining MPLS-RT comments
>>           o divide the model into ³base² and ³extended² features
>>           o general cleanup
>>       * We plan to submit a next revision before next IETF.
>>       * We also want to get feedback from WG/chairs on whether it makes
>>         sense to divide this large document (which is already > 115
>>         pages) into two separate documents ­ one covering LDP Yang and
>>         other mLDP yang.
>>           o We will still keep mLDP model dependent on LDP.
>>           o Please advise.
>>
>>     Rgds.
>>     ‹
>>     Kamran
>>     (on behalf of authors)
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>
>
>-- 
>
>
>Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
>Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
>Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: [phone]