IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Re: Poll: IOAM and PSD

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Wed, 14 August 2024 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495E6C151539; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 08:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.659
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.659 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FjFXP9VafPIt; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 08:24:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF630C15107E; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 08:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WkX9c6grZznknx; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:24:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 4WkX9c5rPHzkx1N; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:24:36 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:24:36 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Message-ID: <ZrzMNBTqiNkV3zu5@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <F78CB19B-2880-48AB-99CE-D46280014A87@tony.li> <DS0PR19MB6501C2C805B65C532B46263FFC872@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <49FD7971-9FC0-4F22-A63A-D2ECB28BF29D@tony.li>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <49FD7971-9FC0-4F22-A63A-D2ECB28BF29D@tony.li>
Message-ID-Hash: 4MWADH5OZJT6QMN7EFKPNY3GMBONGPL6
X-Message-ID-Hash: 4MWADH5OZJT6QMN7EFKPNY3GMBONGPL6
X-MailFrom: eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [mpls] Re: Poll: IOAM and PSD
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/XLrVtlL4w2ktmZx_hhiL8DGpJdE>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

If you want, please add:

Evolved version of draft-eckert-6man-qos-exthdr-discuss as a PSD solution.

Also, in your summary maybe mark the other applications entries with ISD and/or PSD.

Cheers
    Toerless

On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 08:07:46AM -0700, Tony Li wrote:
> [WG chair hat: on]
> 
> To further summarize what Tarek collected:
> 
> Flavors of IOAM:
> - Pre-allocated trace (passport mode), PSD
> - Direct export (postcard mode), PSD & ISD
> - Proof of transit
> - Edge-to-Edge
> 
> Other applications:
> - Path tracing (draft-filsfils-spring-path-tracing-srmpls)
> - Carry a protection/bypass path in packet
> - Application ID and metadata for application aware networking
> - DetNet (draft-varmir-mpls-detnet-mna)
> 
> 
> Please feel free to reply if I’ve missed something.
> 
> Tony
> 
> 
> 
> > On Aug 14, 2024, at 6:41 AM, Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Dear WG,
> >  
> > This poll is now closed. Thanks to everyone who responded.
> > Attached are the collected responses to the poll. Feel free to respond if you think changes need to be made.
> > The chairs will meet to discuss further those responses and will share with the WG further updates.
> >  
> > Regards,
> > Tarek (for MPLS chairs)
> >  
> >  
> > From: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com <mailto:tony1athome@gmail.com>> on behalf of Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li <mailto:tony.li@tony.li>>
> > Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2024 at 11:26 AM
> > To: mpls <mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>>
> > Subject: [mpls] Poll: IOAM and PSD
> > 
> > [WG chair hat: on]
> > 
> >  
> > Hi all,
> >  
> > We’ve had many discussions about IOAM and PSD over the last few years. We need to reach consensus on the problems that need to be addressed in these areas. Therefore, we would like to hear from everyone, especially independent operators:
> >  
> > There are many flavors of IOAM.  Which ones would you like to deploy/implement with MNA?
> > Do you have other applications of MNA that have not been proposed yet?
> >  
> >  This poll will close in two weeks, at 9am PDT, Aug 13.
> >  
> > Regards,
> > MPLS chairs
> > 
> > 
> > <poll_responses.xlsx>
> 

> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list -- mpls@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to mpls-leave@ietf.org


-- 
---
tte@cs.fau.de

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status