Re: [mpls] New Draft Notification: draft-dong-mpls-rsvp-te-plr-designation-00

>
> Hi,
> This draft is good in selecting the PLRs in the initial LSP setup itself.
> But can this draft handle the dynamic PLR node change?
> Do you have any thought on constrcuting the new TLVs to send the new EROs
> in the established LSP to indicate the new PLR nodes?
>
> Do you really think that administrator should know about all the transit
> nodes of the LSP? I think, this is possible with the help of CSPF but
> collecting the informations about transit node's resources and other
> informations may be tough.
>
> Thanks,
> Venkat.
>
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Jie Dong <dongjie_dj@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> We have submitted a new internet draft "Designation of PLRs in RSVP-TE
>> Fast
>> Reroute"
>>
>> The URL is:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dong-mpls-rsvp-te-plr-designation-00
>>
>> The abstract is as follows:
>>
>> This document defines RSVP-TE extensions which enable the ingress node to
>> designate particular LSRs along the path as Points of Local Repair (PLRs)
>> of
>> the protected LSP, and further indicate the protection type of each PLR.
>> These mechanisms could enhance the control over the establishment of
>> backup
>> LSPs, and also could save the resources needed for establishing and
>> maintaining unnecessary backup LSPs.
>>
>> Any comments and suggestions are appreciated.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Jie
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Venkatesan Mahalingam.
>


-- 
Best Regards,
Venkatesan Mahalingam.