Return-Path: X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C431A7005; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 10:43:22 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fNFN-1sR8QKY; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 10:43:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com (mail-io0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D5131A6FF2; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 10:43:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io0-x235.google.com with SMTP id o67so223465376iof.3; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 10:43:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=RogoXh6WpILRdVUzlezvGaODm0lbMc6wZxwHVlIBv5E=; b=mSX3O/D6CcnKq2w6gltik4fHW0ZvLO6uK01dA/GcC2b5UxrX2IvjBGQ9d1CEV3DUOi EWvBye3Qvq38iWmbhzV6D8hyACM8DeB6y2i48cBgclArQ7PouRIry2xN3XA3uW4c+ZCy bdhuVpU8yAv7ZiN48hIKT/BdIGGKEeB0UHgQ2oGhj/TPEB3vA7r0STEDmmn6P/ORsZfc 7B0bA8YC3Y2dop2dc0yAKS9tekPWK2CyUb7SmsjVPsJQAQv4XPY4223H0TZPClohYFuJ KRwVMQvHH1LgHRN/tyNOL+2LtpE+m0K3HHKbkf3edh0bEyDcZDvMa37yg4Ha57/1yKcC GtmQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.33.12 with SMTP id h12mr35892552ioh.48.1450896196465; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 10:43:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.155.110 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 10:43:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5674E8D9.3020000@pi.nu> Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 10:43:16 -0800 Message-ID: From: Kireeti Kompella To: Mach Chen Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140c20c657a000527951815 Archived-At: Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" , "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" , "draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis@ietf.org" , "Nagendra Kumar Nainar \(naikumar\)" Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 18:43:22 -0000 --001a1140c20c657a000527951815 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Same here. On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Mach Chen wrote: > Same here. > > Best regards, > Mach > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar) [mailto:naikumar@cisco.com] > > Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2015 11:30 PM > > To: Loa Andersson; mpls@ietf.org > > Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org; draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis@ietf.org; > BRUNGARD, > > DEBORAH A > > Subject: Re: IPR poll on draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis > > > > Hi Loa, > > > > I am not aware of any IPR other than those disclosed as part of RFC4379 > or > > drafts merged in this document. > > > > Thanks, > > Nagendra > > > > On 12/19/15, 12:19 AM, "Loa Andersson" wrote: > > > > >Working Group, > > > > > >The authors of draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis has told us that the > > >document is ready for working adoption. > > > > > >We will do an IPR poll in parallel to the wgap. > > > > > >This mail starts the IPR poll. > > > > > >Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis? > > > > > >If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules > > >(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > > > > >There are no IPR disclosures filed directly against this document. > > >However, there are tow IPR disclosures against RFC 4379. > > > > > >If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to > > >this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant > > >IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The > > >document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been > > >received from each author and contributor. > > > > > >If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or > > >contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of > > >any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > > > > > > > >/Loa > > >mpls wg co-chair > > >-- > > > > > > > > >Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com > > >Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu > > >Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 > > -- Kireeti --001a1140c20c657a000527951815 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Same here.

On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Mach Chen <mach.chen@= huawei.com> wrote:
Same her= e.

Best regards,
Mach

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar) [mailto:naikumar@cisco.com]
> Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2015 11:30 PM
> To: Loa Andersson; mpls@ietf.org<= br> > Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org; = draft-smack-mpls-rf= c4379bis@ietf.org; BRUNGARD,
> DEBORAH A
> Subject: Re: IPR poll on draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis
>
> Hi Loa,
>
> I am not aware of any IPR other than those disclosed as part of RFC437= 9 or
> drafts merged in this document.
>
> Thanks,
> Nagendra
>
> On 12/19/15, 12:19 AM, "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu> wrote:
>
> >Working Group,
> >
> >The authors of draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis has told us that the > >document is ready for working adoption.
> >
> >We will do an IPR poll in parallel to the wgap.
> >
> >This mail starts the IPR poll.
> >
> >Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379b= is?
> >
> >If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rul= es
> >(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
> >
> >There are no IPR disclosures filed directly against this document.=
> >However, there are=C2=A0 tow IPR disclosures against RFC 4379.
> >
> >If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respo= nd to
> >this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relev= ant
> >IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* = The
> >document will not advance to the next stage until a response has b= een
> >received from each author and contributor.
> >
> >If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an auth= or or
> >contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware = of
> >any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF r= ules.
> >
> >
> >/Loa
> >mpls wg co-chair
> >--
> >
> >
> >Loa Andersson=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
> >Senior MPLS Expert=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 loa= @pi.nu
> >Huawei Technologies (consultant)=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0phone: +46 739 81 21 64=




--
=
Kireeti
--001a1140c20c657a000527951815--