[mpls] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-usecases

[Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>]

Hi Xiao Min,
thank you for your support of this work; much appreciated. Please find my
notes below tagged GIM>>.

Regards,
Greg

On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 11:53 PM <[e-mail]> wrote:

> I support progressing this draft to publication.
>
>
> Two small comments as below for the authors to consider.
>
> One is on Section 2.2.1 In-situ OAM, IOAM Trace Options include only
> Pre-allocated Trace and Incremental Trace, and other types of IOAM Option
> are not IOAM Trace Options.
>
GIM>> You are correct. These are all IOAM Option Types. I propose the
following editorial update:
OLD TEXT:
   Several IOAM Trace Options have been defined:
   *  Pre-allocated and Incremental
   *  Edge-to-Edge
   *  Proof-of-Transit
   *  Direct Export (DEX)
 NEW TEXT:
   Several IOAM Option-Types have been defined:
   *  Pre-allocated Trace and Incremental Trace
   *  Edge-to-Edge
   *  Proof-of-Transit
   *  Direct Export (DEX)
Would that update address your concern?

> Another one is on Section 2.2.2 Alternate Marking Method, I would be happy
> if a reference to draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation can be added.
>
GIM>> In the course of the discussions, it appears to me that the group
agreed to concentrate on the method that can be realized using MNA, not on
an example of implementation in the MPLS network. WDYT?

>
> Best Regards,
>
> Xiao Min
> Original
> *From: *TonyLi <[e-mail]>
> *To: *mpls <[e-mail]>;
> *Cc: *mpls-chairs <[e-mail]>;
> *Date: *2024年06月05日 06:26
> *Subject: **[mpls] WGLC on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-usecases*
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>
> [WG chair hat: on]
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
> This starts a 2 week working group last call
> on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-usecases (
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-mna-usecases/)
>
> This WGLC will expire at 4pm PDT, Jun 18, 2024.
>
> Please comment as to the readiness of this document for publication, both
> pro and con.
>
> There are no IPR filings against this document.
>
> Regards,
> Tony
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>