IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr (2nd WG call)

Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Mon, 30 September 2024 00:43 UTC

Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78040C14F5FC; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 17:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.204
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.204 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RSohGylqQG7i; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 17:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F323C15108B; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 17:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4XH2Jj4sjJz6LDYH; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 08:39:33 +0800 (CST)
Received: from lhrpeml100003.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.160.210]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD550140A35; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 08:43:38 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggpemf200007.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.2) by lhrpeml100003.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 01:43:38 +0100
Received: from kwepemf100007.china.huawei.com (7.202.181.221) by dggpemf200007.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 08:43:35 +0800
Received: from kwepemf100007.china.huawei.com ([7.202.181.221]) by kwepemf100007.china.huawei.com ([7.202.181.221]) with mapi id 15.02.1544.011; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 08:43:35 +0800
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr (2nd WG call)
Thread-Index: AQHbDoUwKFW6ojt28kyIJnukrZbcFLJpvwyAgAD84/CAAwAlgIAACnkAgACEz4CAACZagIABAzlA//+F8wCAAIsZoA==
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:43:35 +0000
Message-ID: <17428b303a3540ba8266b78128f27938@huawei.com>
References: <DS0PR19MB65014515D511B396E79BA36FFCF82@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <LV8P220MB1914BBB4896362040615CAB2FC6F2@LV8P220MB1914.NAMP220.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <5f5db9a20d8e4b47b5515b686e834227@huawei.com> <4819c3baa7bd4bff81babbd913db2227@huawei.com> <DM6PR11MB46922AC760C358D172A6A4B7DE752@DM6PR11MB4692.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <452FDD29-F8A9-417A-8BC6-B16721385AEC@tony.li> <DM6PR11MB46923BEAA8216EFBE0545290DE752@DM6PR11MB4692.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <2AEEDFE6-230A-4A19-BF5E-3B9AC34B5603@tony.li> <7390a29e261f4728a31e6984240efdab@huawei.com> <CA+RyBmXLYTybEGsSK6Wx0+g-TnPStWGN-zosfRutsJ1Eo2kDzA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmXLYTybEGsSK6Wx0+g-TnPStWGN-zosfRutsJ1Eo2kDzA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.112.40.118]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_17428b303a3540ba8266b78128f27938huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: 3RBPCPFAD4NNQ3RCIYIAE4YZJTSO775A
X-Message-ID-Hash: 3RBPCPFAD4NNQ3RCIYIAE4YZJTSO775A
X-MailFrom: zhoutianran@huawei.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mpls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr@ietf.org>, "Zhukeyi(Kaiyin,Datacom Standard&Patent)" <zhukeyi@huawei.com>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [mpls] Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr (2nd WG call)
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/YXaH9f9nMgMTfVyF2EVvEoJyKo0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mpls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mpls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Greg,

Please see below:

   5.   Subject to the constraints in these requirements, a Network
        Action solution MAY carry MNA information in-stack, post-stack,
        or both in-stack and post-stack.

   6.   Solution specifications MUST NOT require an implementation to
        support in-stack ancillary data, unless the implementation
        chooses to support an NA that uses in-stack ancillary data.

Tianran
From: Greg Mirsky [mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2024 8:24 AM
To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
Cc: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>; Zafar Ali (zali) <zali@cisco.com>; mpls <mpls@ietf.org>; mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr (2nd WG call)

Hi Tianran,
Please point me to the part of RFC 9613<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9613/> that supports your request.

Regards,
Greg

On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 4:44 PM Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
The IPR poll for the two document did not hit the point.
The point is how can the MNA mechanism disable the ISD and use PSD only.
The draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr need to resolve this.

Tianran

From: Tony Li [mailto:tony1athome@gmail.com<mailto:tony1athome@gmail.com>] On Behalf Of Tony Li
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2024 12:13 AM
To: Zafar Ali (zali) <zali@cisco.com<mailto:zali@cisco.com>>
Cc: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com<mailto:zhoutianran@huawei.com>>; Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com<mailto:jie.dong@huawei.com>>; Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com<mailto:tsaad.net@gmail.com>>; mpls <mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>>; mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:mpls-chairs@ietf.org>>; draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-hdr (2nd WG call)


Hi Zafar,

I am aware of the thread but all we hear is that chairs are discussing the responses and will share further update, “interest” vs. “consensus” debate, the chairs are discussing how to initiate the PSD debate, etc. There were 65 emails on the original PSD poll. I am not sure why we need another round of debate and what will be the nature of that debate. Why not just start WG adoption call and gauge the WG “consensus”.


That’s exactly what we’re doing. The process for doing this begins with an IPR poll.

Nic started the IPR poll on draft-mb-mpls-ioam-dex and draft-gandhi-mpls-ioam-dex on Sept 3.
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/XU3Ycij6Oq2kGWi14k3eXmpdQvM/
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/7NmJqyMHDairPxEn7PGxz99KNiI/

Tony


_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list -- mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
To unsubscribe send an email to mpls-leave@ietf.org<mailto:mpls-leave@ietf.org>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status