Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-kompella-mpls-rmr as an MPLS wg dcument
Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com> Thu, 01 October 2015 13:27 UTC
Return-Path: <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C431A0015; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 06:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r_ocqac_NtAR; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 06:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D53B11A000D; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 06:27:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BYG28072; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 13:27:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML504-MBS.china.huawei.com ([10.125.30.107]) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:27:38 +0100
From: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-kompella-mpls-rmr@ietf.org" <draft-kompella-mpls-rmr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-kompella-mpls-rmr as an MPLS wg dcument
Thread-Index: AQHQ/EzvfUY3gQ+7pEaBVDMKUyFosA==
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 13:27:36 +0000
Message-ID: <91E3A1BD737FDF4FA14118387FF6766B155C666A@lhreml504-mbs>
References: <mailman.138.1443452463.3777.mpls@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.138.1443452463.3777.mpls@ietf.org>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.200.144.142]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/YXtpUKbaXwJSSDuSwupULC1h-bw>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-kompella-mpls-rmr as an MPLS wg dcument
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 13:27:49 -0000
Yes, support Italo > Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 19:07:20 +0800 > From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> > To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" > <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-kompella-mpls-rmr@ietf.org" > <draft-kompella-mpls-rmr@ietf.org> > Subject: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt > draft-kompella-mpls-rmr as an MPLS wg dcument > Message-ID: <56091F68.8050000@pi.nu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > Working Group, > > This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-kompella-mpls-rmr-02 > as an MPLS working group document. > > Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working > group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical motivation > for your support/not support, especially if you think that the document > should not be adopted as a working group document. > > There is currently one IPR disclosure against this document. All the > authors has stated on the working group mailing that they are unaware > of any undisclosed IPRs that relates to this draft.. > > However if you are on the the mpls working group mailing list and aware > of IPR that relates to this draft, the time to disclose this is now. > > This poll ends October 12, 2015. > > /Loa > mpls wg co-chair > > -- > > > Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com > Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu > Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 14:29:54 +0000 > From: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com> > To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, > "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, > "draft-kompella-mpls-rmr@ietf.org" <draft-kompella-mpls- > rmr@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt > draft-kompella-mpls-rmr as an MPLS wg dcument > Message-ID: > <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF112218E5ECE@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > yes/support > > Regards, > Greg > > -----Original Message----- > From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson > Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 4:07 AM > To: mpls@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org; draft-kompella-mpls- > rmr@ietf.org > Subject: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft- > kompella-mpls-rmr as an MPLS wg dcument > > Working Group, > > This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-kompella-mpls-rmr-02 > as an MPLS working group document. > > Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working > group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical motivation > for your support/not support, especially if you think that the document > should not be adopted as a working group document. > > There is currently one IPR disclosure against this document. All the > authors has stated on the working group mailing that they are unaware > of any undisclosed IPRs that relates to this draft.. > > However if you are on the the mpls working group mailing list and aware > of IPR that relates to this draft, the time to disclose this is now. > > This poll ends October 12, 2015. > > /Loa > mpls wg co-chair > > -- > > > Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com > Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu > Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 > > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 07:45:14 -0700 > From: "Kathleen Moriarty" <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> > To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org> > Cc: mpls@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply@ietf.org, > mpls-chairs@ietf.org > Subject: [mpls] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on > draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10: (with COMMENT) > Message-ID: <20150928144514.27528.79571.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss- > criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks for your work on this draft. The security review from 6 months > ago hasn't been fully addressed in the draft and I think it would be > helpful to do so. There were responses given on list, but > corresponding updates didn't happen for all of the comments. > > https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg05301.html > > For the first comment, the response was that this mechanism does not > deprecate use of "Echo Reply". The language in the first paragraph of > section 3 should be made clear on that point. > > For the second comment: > s4.1: Is the outermost label allowed to be set to 255 to support > the > ?ping? mode or must it always be set to 1, 2, etc. to > support ?traceroute" > mode - as described in RFC 4379 s4.3? I know s5 is just an > example > but it really looks like this extension is just supposed to be for > fault > isolation. > > The response via email says it is possible to set it to 255, could this > be made clear in the draft? > > The third comment was addressed, thank you. > > It was also good to see the security considerations cover path > discovery as well as DoS related attacks. Thanks for that! > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 07:55:10 -0700 > From: "Alia Atlas" <akatlas@gmail.com> > To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org> > Cc: mpls@ietf.org, > draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple.shepherd@ietf.org, > mpls-chairs@ietf.org, > draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple@ietf.org, > draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple.ad@ietf.org, > rcallon@juniper.net > Subject: [mpls] Alia Atlas' Yes on > draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-04: (with COMMENT) > Message-ID: <20150928145510.31971.547.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode-simple-04: Yes > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss- > criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-reply-mode- > simple/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > 1) Bottom of page 7: Please describe the meaning of the length field > in the TLV and whether there is any padding. Alternately (or as well) > - give a reference that defines these details. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 10:57:10 -0400 > From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> > To: Lizhong Jin <lizho.jin@gmail.com> > Cc: "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" > <mpls@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay- > reply.all@ietf.org, > IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg- > dir@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call: > <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10.txt> (Relayed Echo Reply > mechanism for LSP Ping) to Proposed Standard > Message-ID: > <CAA=duU30D_YoHHx3DWEQBS- > 7ZnDfWmF=oEt4v43QSNQNdhS2vA@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Lizhong, > > [Lizhong] I proposed to add the following, and waiting for his > confirmation. > > This stack grows downward, with relay node addresses further along > the > > LSP appearing lower down in the stack. Please refer to section 4.2 > for > > the relay node discovery mechanism. > > > > If this is acceptable to Joel, I'm good with it as well. > > Thanks, > Andy > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/attachments/20150928/e15 > aedbc/attachment.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 11:00:40 -0400 > From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> > To: Lizhong Jin <lizho.jin@gmail.com> > Cc: "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" > <mpls@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay- > reply.all@ietf.org, > IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg- > dir@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call: > <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10.txt> (Relayed Echo Reply > mechanism for LSP Ping) to Proposed Standard > Message-ID: > <CAA=duU1z+hLZ759TJtjRZOK0s8OsajHcLdzQ0Z- > OfKvFgrD_QQ@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Lizhong, > > Responding to myself, I just saw Joel's email, so we're both good with > this addition. > > Thanks, > Andy > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Lizhong, > > > > [Lizhong] I proposed to add the following, and waiting for his > >> confirmation. > >> This stack grows downward, with relay node addresses further along > >> the LSP appearing lower down in the stack. Please refer to section > >> 4.2 for the relay node discovery mechanism. > >> > > > > If this is acceptable to Joel, I'm good with it as well. > > > > Thanks, > > Andy > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/attachments/20150928/d19 > 42cb3/attachment.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > > > ------------------------------ > > End of mpls Digest, Vol 137, Issue 54 > *************************************
- [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt … Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Santosh Esale
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Ambrose Kwong
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… weiqiang cheng
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… George Swallow (swallow)
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Kireeti Kompella
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Nadeau Thomas
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Chandrasekar Ramachandran
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Italo Busi
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to ad… LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO
- [mpls] Closed - Re: Poll to see if we have consen… Loa Andersson