[mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7394 (4297)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 10 March 2015 21:27 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C1B1A8A65 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gV2TkUVxZjt1 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311941A8A67 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 6ADA0180452; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:26:51 -0700 (PDT)
To: sboutros@cisco.com, msiva@cisco.com, swallow@cisco.com, ssaxena@cisco.com, vishwas@ionosnetworks.com, aldrin.ietf@gmail.com, akatlas@gmail.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, loa@pi.nu, swallow@cisco.com, rcallon@juniper.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20150310212651.6ADA0180452@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:26:51 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/YuAUFj-FeoB9ObCllmDHrgmiX14>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7394 (4297)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 21:27:39 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7394, "Definition of Time to Live TLV for LSP-Ping Mechanisms". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7394&eid=4297 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Himanshu Shah <hshah@ciena.com> Section: 3.1 Original Text ------------- 3.1. TTL TLV Format 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type = 32769 | Length = 8 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Value | Reserved | Flags | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 1: Time To Live TLV Format Corrected Text -------------- 3.1. TTL TLV Format 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type = 32769 | Length = 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Value | Reserved | Flags | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 1: Time To Live TLV Format Notes ----- In a TTL, Length value should show length of the value fields. There are already a couple of implementations out there which is setting the length to 4 (4-byte) This should be corrected in order to make this RFC interoperable between different vendors. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7394 (draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ttl-tlv-10) -------------------------------------- Title : Definition of Time to Live TLV for LSP-Ping Mechanisms Publication Date : November 2014 Author(s) : S. Boutros, S. Sivabalan, G. Swallow, S. Saxena, V. Manral, S. Aldrin Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Multiprotocol Label Switching Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7394 (4297) RFC Errata System
- Re: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7394 (4… Thomas D. Nadeau
- [mpls] [Errata Verified] RFC7394 (4297) RFC Errata System