Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10.txt> (Relayed Echo Reply mechanism for LSP Ping) to Proposed Standard

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Mon, 28 September 2015 14:57 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E421A9308; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 07:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SMc6oLkL3AS6; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 07:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A33631A9139; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 07:57:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so105139514wic.0; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 07:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=HoM8lTfeg2epC0t9M1UVd8DJzHneiBIy54ToZ33iays=; b=FxHkjrfDmL0RGMrHjd3QgcZPjpvWQbqpD/+JU3JlMtE+QcULHKCxydvta8XoTt4D+z shK+xEdgaYi3SWqdTLiGb/+l5MFHVGc60odbwDfHgdltoytbs+J1zRBmmqssrG7mxdYd vibm1jJSS9NM1X6F5iRSw+atUgxMr8epUtB/D7P1fsYbKbcn/8lZNJjtBGWJcIJ4VTwg 3YMCYLnRiL7OE8d5QzPPU1zaJuNKciqhosPHiDnNZJFsHC26iYpuQevfqQ5Wc5WeQk+/ 4GnywJLmyUawi73Ldgs5pybCtvrCEoV8q/BAgIn/bjKPHHncCAZCkDn9NUMU0NsEvT9I kxRw==
X-Received: by 10.180.109.135 with SMTP id hs7mr20128915wib.12.1443452249684; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 07:57:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.9.212 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 07:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAH==cJxBEHp18dkmKfvVCiohG1u=pj-FLPX2hTMckHF5btSL3w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA=duU0u44mjZ+oTC+7x3r8uhWvBUbniFshw-1sVaM0FFBSAoQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAH==cJxBEHp18dkmKfvVCiohG1u=pj-FLPX2hTMckHF5btSL3w@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 10:57:10 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU30D_YoHHx3DWEQBS-7ZnDfWmF=oEt4v43QSNQNdhS2vA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lizhong Jin <lizho.jin@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f234d0597c36a0520cfea78
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/YzBpRAi5ee0iSRNPtoAvOqxnnRc>
Cc: "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply.all@ietf.org, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10.txt> (Relayed Echo Reply mechanism for LSP Ping) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 14:57:33 -0000

Lizhong,

[Lizhong] I proposed to add the following, and waiting for his confirmation.
> This stack grows downward, with relay node addresses further along the LSP appearing
> lower down in the stack. Please refer to section 4.2 for the relay node
> discovery mechanism.
>

If this is acceptable to Joel, I'm good with it as well.

Thanks,
Andy