[mpls] poll on draft-chen-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping

George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com> Thu, 15 July 2010 02:57 UTC

Return-Path: <swallow@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227293A677C for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.18
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.18 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.419, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J3rX8Lzq0TqP for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0613A63CB for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtUFANoVPkytJV2b/2dsb2JhbACTLoxIcaVtmmqFJASIUII0
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.55,205,1278288000"; d="scan'208";a="132532672"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Jul 2010 02:57:58 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-101.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-101.cisco.com [72.163.62.138]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o6F2vwu8019192 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 02:57:58 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-106.cisco.com ([72.163.62.148]) by xbh-rcd-101.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:57:58 -0500
Received: from 10.98.32.163 ([10.98.32.163]) by XMB-RCD-106.cisco.com ([72.163.62.148]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 02:57:58 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.25.0.100505
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:57:57 -0400
From: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>
To: mpls@ietf.org
Message-ID: <C863F175.277EE%swallow@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: poll on draft-chen-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping
Thread-Index: AcsjyYb4daQy1EhyXkGjfIBKdsbukg==
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jul 2010 02:57:58.0886 (UTC) FILETIME=[8817F060:01CB23C9]
Subject: [mpls] poll on draft-chen-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 02:57:52 -0000

The poll on draft-chen-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping closed yesterday.
There was strong support and no objections to making this a WG document.

Mach - please submit the draft (unchanged) as
draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping as soon as submissions are
re-opened.

...George