[mpls] [Errata Verified] RFC7110 (4197)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 09 December 2014 19:22 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304E11A1BBE; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 11:22:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3TMsyvXQbQxv; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 11:22:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98791A1A0B; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 11:22:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 738D1181CEB; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 11:21:38 -0800 (PST)
To: ietfc@btconnect.com, mach.chen@huawei.com, wayne.caowei@huawei.com, ning.so@tatacommunications.com, frederic.jounay@orange.ch, simon.delord@alcatel-lucent.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20141209192138.738D1181CEB@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 11:21:38 -0800
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/ZJZz9vwKWanuD4No52ogVYgsD6M
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] [Errata Verified] RFC7110 (4197)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 19:22:30 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC7110,
"Return Path Specified Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7110&eid=4197

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported by: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
Date Reported: 2014-12-09
Verified by: Adrian Farrel (IESG)

Section: 4

Original Text
-------------
The Reply Path TLV contains one or more nested sub-TLVs that can be
used


Corrected Text
--------------
The Reply Path TLV contains zero or more nested sub-TLVs that can be
used

Notes
-----
As section 4.2 correctly states, the Reply Path TLV can contain zero
sub-TLVs; this brings section 4 inline.

--------------------------------------
RFC7110 (draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-15)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Return Path Specified Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping
Publication Date    : January 2014
Author(s)           : M. Chen, W. Cao, S. Ning, F. Jounay, S. Delord
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG