IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to make draft-osborne-mpls-psc-updates a working group document

Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com> Fri, 04 October 2013 20:42 UTC

Return-Path: <huubatwork@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E68B21F9E96 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 13:42:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J+E2GAthNj-J for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 13:42:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ea0-x22f.google.com (mail-ea0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C9721F9C7B for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 13:42:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ea0-f175.google.com with SMTP id m14so2052935eaj.34 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 13:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rnhiFIwv9boAiIh8pvQEO9/jgTF8I3JDPAu/j3M3og8=; b=mxBieAGggMjuEwzB/E45E2GU+Jfw9trQY8SsnALL+FzR9bHt9TCE2QsOde9i62d9uJ AROcUSeo5//D94c30yZtOt+LLK53l6HFHBoC2eOWpuaLXs4o0e2n8vDcfH4G2ttX0yAS 2442r7di/2jTt9fRd75Ud5p2a/+rb7JM+tQA6oSTOvGw3t1I3eDWB92w1WnLlKrsM6RG Ox+osLIVRAtvSF19yG9r3cer8xDg13XgsZIFlb6fC3/qtXj8TGl5Pm+9/P7huhkIA3t6 hbbYvJanWjkt5dr3kWPSFIq2NchtBy8GwyJBKZX1YauBlxJCej3uxeMDmhe+8Kh/dQiq tQwg==
X-Received: by 10.14.218.197 with SMTP id k45mr24721493eep.32.1380919364432; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 13:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from McAsterix.local (g215085.upc-g.chello.nl. [80.57.215.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a1sm31892173eem.1.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Oct 2013 13:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <524F2843.9060200@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 22:42:43 +0200
From: Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
References: <524EB743.6040107@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <524EB743.6040107@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-osborne-mpls-psc-updates@tools.ietf.org" <draft-osborne-mpls-psc-updates@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to make draft-osborne-mpls-psc-updates a working group document
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: huubatwork@gmail.com
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 20:42:47 -0000

Support,

Huub.

===========
On 04-10-13 14:40, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> This is to start a two week poll on to see if we have consensus to adopt
> draft-osborne-mpls-psc-updates-03 as an MPLS working group document.
>
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list (mpls at ietf.org). Please give a technical
> motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
> the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
>
> Please note that this document only updates RFC6378 and that we chosen
> this path rather than do a RFC6378bis.
>
> This poll ends October 18, 2013.
>
> There are no IPR claims disclosed against this document.
>
> The author has stated on the working group mailing list that he is
> not aware of any IPRs related to this draft.
> However if you are on the the mpls working group mailing list and
> aware of IPR that relates to this draft, the time to disclose
> this is now.
>
> /Loa
> (mpls wg co-chair)


-- 
*****************************************************************
               请记住，你是独一无二的，就像其他每一个人一样

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email