Re: [mpls] working group last call draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu-01

[Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>]

Folks,

I've reviewed this document (actually fourth or fifth time) and I have
very few comments, I think Adrian covered  all mine in his review.

I had something that I thought were spelling errors, but turns out to
be differences between UK and US English. I'm pretty sure that the
RFC Editor will set that right (if it isn't already).

There is one thing that sometimes makes hard to parse the document,
the abbreviation WTR stands for "Wait to restore", the thing is that
WTR can be a state, a message or a timer (given that I understand it
correctly).  When I discussed this earlier the answer has been "Well
it is confusing, but that is how it is done!"

I think at places where it necessary e.g. WTR are qualified  with
state, message or timer. I found one place where want to add a
clarifying "state", "message" or "timer".

page 13 last line - s/WTR expires/WTR timer expires

page 20 3rd line from the - s/WTR expires/WTR timer expires

page 25 Note 4 s/WTR/WTR state

page 25 Note 6 s/WTR/WTR state

page 27 Note 11 s/WTR/WTR state

DNR may be a state or a message, for clarification

page 27 note 11 s/DNR./DNR state.

The same exercise maybe be done for EXER [command, message] (actually
I think that for EXER this is done correctly), but it might valuable
to check for all abbreviations that has double meaning.

I don't think it is necessary or even motivated to do more about
this, but it might be a good if readers of the document were aware of
this.

I think the document - modulo addressing comments in wglc - is ready
to go.

/Loa

On 2014-01-20 10:28, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> This is to start a two week working group last call on
> draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu.
>
> Please find the document at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-psc-itu/
>
> The document editors has also supplied a "diff-list" between
> version -00 and -01 at:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/current/msg11338.html
>
> ITU-T SG15 has advised us that this document is a necessary reference
> for documents that is planned to go into the ITU-T approval process
> from the SG15 meeting end of March / beginning of April. Editors,
> authors and chairs has put in quite an effort to make this document
> ready. The schedule is very tight.
>
> We are now doing several review steps in parallel
>
> - the normal working group last call, please send your comments to the
>    mpls working group mailing list ([e-mail])
> - the working group chairs reviewed this document as part of the
>    mpls-rt review, normally we do a wg chair review before starting the
>    wglc, this review will now take place in parallel
> - after the wglc and publication request there is an AD evaluation,
>    this will now also take place in parallel with the wglc
>
> The editors and authors are advised to try to resolve as many of the
> comments as possible (on the mailing list) as they come in, but not to
> post the new version of the draft until the wglc is closed and the
> comments are resolved.
>
> This working group last call ends February 3rd.
>
> /Loa
> for the MPLS WG co-chairs

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: [phone]