Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to adopt draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-updates as an mpls working group document

[Yuji Tochio <[e-mail]>]

Support

Regards, Yuji

On 2016/03/05 17:39, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> This is to start a two week poll on adopting draft-ryoo-mpls-tp-aps-
> updates as an MPLS working group document.
>
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list ([e-mail]) Please give a technical
> motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
> the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
>
> There are no IPR disclosures against this document.
>
> All the authors has stated on the on the mpls wg mailing list that they
> are not aware of any IPRs that relate to this document.
>
> Note: One of the issues that surfaced in the MPLS-RT review was that the
> implementation status was unclear. To check on this we did an early
> implementation poll. There have been responses to the mailing, to the
> mpls wg chairs and to my uni-directionally. The conclusion is that
> RFC 7271 (the specification that this document updates) is well
> implemented and we know of deployments; a rather large number of
> vendors says that they will implement this draft and operators has
> stated that it will be deployed once it is available.
>
> The working group adoption poll ends March 19, 2016.
>
> /Loa
>
> MPLS wg co-chair.