[mpls] Recent update : draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip-04.txt

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sat, 13 April 2019 20:27 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D3F1200D5; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 13:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QbhSgiBmw4Om; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 13:27:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E591F120033; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 13:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x3DKRMgp012867; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 21:27:22 +0100
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F86B22042; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 21:27:22 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A25422048; Sat, 13 Apr 2019 21:27:22 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([87.114.253.143]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x3DKRImg013880 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 13 Apr 2019 21:27:19 +0100
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <mpls@ietf.org>, "'Mirja Kuehlewind'" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, "'Alvaro Retana'" <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "'BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A'" <db3546@att.com>
Cc: <draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip@ietf.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 21:27:17 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <07d001d4f237$4c3100f0$e49302d0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AdTyNyocqKPRgOsVQ+eXj2iFO0gd6g==
X-Originating-IP: 87.114.253.143
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-24550.002
X-TM-AS-Result: No--0.599-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--0.599-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-24550.002
X-TMASE-Result: 10--0.599000-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: VZz6+2A6wprVDAMEwzgZ7Lu9iqQJLR0vTJDl9FKHbrmH8Gp6NIN6goL8 17LE9TTs5rCqjBLF8SfnLQ6DoH8uxsME2BsoiKJMydRN/Yyg4pgk80hXoYXyawVB1XtT2b8hvyQ s1YtVVkjaL/cwuyD9C33J0gEt3fM9GAdnzrnkM485f9Xw/xqKXVsKO+9Zlb5JEpKRTJaKTD0UGm 4zriL0oQtuKBGekqUpnH7sbImOEBQZuizsUGlXTJq741zbhuuL+VpCPMPleXMdSJYKpChx4M02u Kpp7mZ022IClohlakyd7+8m/EmB5dnyNKbWDiQGrYiDMHkHLFHkP2yapUEP3KKWedUMQI938fsC +xPFkxvsNp90fT4EjrAUyUg9ogFt
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/_n2p6rAeiB1aKWPFAQdQ1RjWM_w>
Subject: [mpls] Recent update : draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip-04.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 20:27:32 -0000

This new revision addresses the following points...

Mirja's second Discuss point
References to RFC6040 for the ECN field and RFC2983 for DSCP

Alvaro's Comments
Tidied language in Abstract and Introduction wrt "backwards compatibility"
Cleaned text in 3.1 about usage of FIB
Add pointer to RFC 8402 in Security Considerations

Spencer's Comment
Added paragraph in 3.2.3 on Congestion Control considerations

Ben's Comments
Lots of little changes per my email

A further update will be needed for Mirja's first Discuss point and for
Alvaro's Discuss.

Thanks,
Adrian