Re: [mpls] Working Group Adoption Poll (WGAP) on draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd

Hi Loa, 

I've read this document and support its adoption. 

I have one comment which could be resolved either before or after the adoption.

Section 3.2 describes the Non-IP Encapsulation of Multipoint BFD, in which a new ACH channel type is defined, and it says a Source Address TLV MUST immediately follow a BFD control message. 

I'd suggest to provide a figure of the packet format of non-IP Multipoint BFD encapsulation. And one related question is: is the source address TLV considered as part of the Multipoint BFD packet or not?

Best regards,
Jie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 6:36 AM
> To: mpls@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org
> Subject: [mpls] Working Group Adoption Poll (WGAP) on
> draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd
> 
> Working Group,
> 
> This is to start a two week poll on adopting
>   draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd
> as a MPLS working group document.
> 
> Though "two weeks" brings all the way into the holiday season. so it will be a
> bit longer.
> 
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org) Please give a technical motivation for your
> support/not support, especially if you think that the document should not be
> adopted as a working group document.
> 
> There is no IPRs disclosure against this document.
> 
> The authors have all stated on the MPLS wg mailing list that they are
> unaware of any IPRs that relates to this document.
> 
> The working group adoption poll ends January 4, 2022.
> 
> /Loa
> --
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls