Re: [mpls] Working Group Adoption Poll (WGAP) on draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd

"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Wed, 22 December 2021 03:14 UTC

Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D07E3A0997; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 19:14:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H8DEI-pCOInh; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 19:14:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EB243A0994; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 19:14:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fraeml712-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.226]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4JJdfP2Hbzz6H7Mw; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 11:12:13 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggeme703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.99) by fraeml712-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.20; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 04:14:42 +0100
Received: from dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.100) by dggeme703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.20; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 11:14:40 +0800
Received: from dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.77]) by dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.77]) with mapi id 15.01.2308.020; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 11:14:39 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd@ietf.org" <draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Working Group Adoption Poll (WGAP) on draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd
Thread-Index: AQHX8HHyg4G/Hx2Yt0yzZ2tPtmD2Hqw851/g
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 03:14:39 +0000
Message-ID: <93117e385f944efeadf5c1e6eb954e1e@huawei.com>
References: <8cfdc537-27da-240e-be9e-835b0d5fc82d@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <8cfdc537-27da-240e-be9e-835b0d5fc82d@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.112.40.66]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/a70V_bSFT_lV8cQoZPwD3TGkNQY>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Working Group Adoption Poll (WGAP) on draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 03:14:53 -0000

Hi Loa, 

I've read this document and support its adoption. 

I have one comment which could be resolved either before or after the adoption.

Section 3.2 describes the Non-IP Encapsulation of Multipoint BFD, in which a new ACH channel type is defined, and it says a Source Address TLV MUST immediately follow a BFD control message. 

I'd suggest to provide a figure of the packet format of non-IP Multipoint BFD encapsulation. And one related question is: is the source address TLV considered as part of the Multipoint BFD packet or not?

Best regards,
Jie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 6:36 AM
> To: mpls@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org
> Subject: [mpls] Working Group Adoption Poll (WGAP) on
> draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd
> 
> Working Group,
> 
> This is to start a two week poll on adopting
>   draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd
> as a MPLS working group document.
> 
> Though "two weeks" brings all the way into the holiday season. so it will be a
> bit longer.
> 
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical motivation for your
> support/not support, especially if you think that the document should not be
> adopted as a working group document.
> 
> There is no IPRs disclosure against this document.
> 
> The authors have all stated on the MPLS wg mailing list that they are
> unaware of any IPRs that relates to this document.
> 
> The working group adoption poll ends January 4, 2022.
> 
> /Loa
> --
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls