[mpls] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 08 September 2020 22:37 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4B03A00C9; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, mpls-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang@ietf.org, loa@pi.nu
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.16.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <159960462265.21015.6727119911072959300@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 15:37:03 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/a8jQqopl39daj8o6b6VZ1RJJw8U>
Subject: [mpls] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 22:37:03 -0000
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang-15: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Section 11. Thanks for enumerating the sensitive read operations. It looks like the sensitive writes aren’t described. Wouldn’t it be a problem for arbitrary writes to occur to /rt:routing/mpls/*? I recommend using the "template language" of "There are a number of data nodes defined in these YANG modules that are writable/creatable/deletable ... These are the subtrees and data nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:" to provide this easy fix. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the clear introduction of how this models was designed (Section 2.2 and 2.3) and builds on prior work. Editorial nits: -- Section 1. Editorial. There is a tool chain artifact which is leaving “{!RFC8349}” in the text. -- Section 2.3. Typo. s/Adjecency/Adjacency/ -- Section 2.5. Typo. s/aaugmentation/augmentation/
- [mpls] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
- Re: [mpls] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Tarek Saad
- Re: [mpls] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Roman Danyliw