Re: [mpls] Seeking WG and chairs feedback on LDP/mLDP Yang doc split [Re: A quick update on LDP/mLDP Yang model (draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mldp-yang)]

["Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Kamran,

Thanks for adding. I also favor the split to two documents that allows the base LDP document to possibly mature/advance faster.
Along the same lines, will you be considering mLDP as a standalone YANG module (e.g. an augmentation of base LDP)?

Regards,
Tarek

On 2016-10-18, 3:07 PM, "Kamran Raza (skraza)" <[e-mail]> wrote:

    + Tarek
    
    On 2016-10-18, 9:24 AM, "Kamran Raza (skraza)" <[e-mail]> wrote:
    
    >Hi Loa,
    >
    >1. We expect LDP document to be little bigger than mLDP as it sets the
    >base for both LDP and mLDP.
    >2. Yes, both documents will be made related where mLDP one being dependent
    >on LDP document with proper x-ref.
    >
    >Rgds.
    >‹
    >Kamran
    >
    >On 2016-10-18, 8:22 AM, "Loa Andersson" <[e-mail]> wrote:
    >
    >>Folks,
    >>
    >>One useful piece of information is what the relative size of the to
    >>documents would be. If we come tp som sort of "equal size" documents
    >>I see no problem splitting the current document.
    >>
    >>I would advice adding some info to both documents on the relationship
    >>between the documents.
    >>
    >>/Loa
    >>
    >>On 2016-10-13 02:08, Santosh Esale wrote:
    >>> The present document which is around 115 pages long is only expected to
    >>> get bigger as we add more operational states in the upcoming revision.
    >>> Please
    >>> let us know your comments and suggestions.
    >>>
    >>> Thanks,
    >>> Santosh (on behalf of authors)
    >>> On 10/11/16, 12:07 PM, "mpls on behalf of Kamran Raza (skraza)"
    >>> <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> on behalf of
    >>> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>     Hello MPLS WG and WG chairs,
    >>>
    >>>     [Refer to our email two weeks ago]
    >>>
    >>>     Keeping in view some of the MPLS-RT review comments and the current
    >>>     size of the join document (draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mldp-yang), we, the
    >>>     authors, are thinking of splitting the LDP/mLDP Yang model into two
    >>>     separate documents ­ one for LDP and other for mLDP - and would
    >>>like
    >>>     to get WG and chairs feedback on this.
    >>>
    >>>     Please comment/advise accordingly.
    >>>     Rgds.
    >>>     ‹
    >>>     Kamran
    >>>     (on behalf of authors)
    >>>
    >>>     From: Syed Kamran Raza <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
    >>>     Date: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 1:14 PM
    >>>     To: "[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>" <[e-mail]
    >>>     <mailto:[e-mail]>>, "[e-mail]
    >>>     <mailto:[e-mail]>" <[e-mail]
    >>>     <mailto:[e-mail]>>
    >>>     Cc: "[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>"
    >>>     <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>,
    >>>     "[e-mail]
    >>>     <mailto:[e-mail]>"
    >>>     <[e-mail]
    >>>     <mailto:[e-mail]>>
    >>>     Subject: [mpls] A quick update on LDP/mLDP Yang model
    >>>     (draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mldp-yang)
    >>>
    >>>     Hello MPLS WG and WG chairs,
    >>>
    >>>     This email is to give a quick update on the current work being done
    >>>     on  the IETF LDP/mLDP Yang draft
    >>>(draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-mldp-yang-00).
    >>>
    >>>       * Multi-vendor team is meeting twice a month to progress on the
    >>>         model:
    >>>           o Cisco, Juniper, Huawei, Ciena, Ericsson, Nokia
    >>>       * The current focus of the team is to:
    >>>           o address remaining MPLS-RT comments
    >>>           o divide the model into ³base² and ³extended² features
    >>>           o general cleanup
    >>>       * We plan to submit a next revision before next IETF.
    >>>       * We also want to get feedback from WG/chairs on whether it makes
    >>>         sense to divide this large document (which is already > 115
    >>>         pages) into two separate documents ­ one covering LDP Yang and
    >>>         other mLDP yang.
    >>>           o We will still keep mLDP model dependent on LDP.
    >>>           o Please advise.
    >>>
    >>>     Rgds.
    >>>     ‹
    >>>     Kamran
    >>>     (on behalf of authors)
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> _______________________________________________
    >>> mpls mailing list
    >>> [e-mail]
    >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
    >>>
    >>
    >>-- 
    >>
    >>
    >>Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
    >>Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
    >>Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: [phone]
    >