[mpls] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-05: (with COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana <aretana@cisco.com> Wed, 24 May 2017 13:32 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018AE129B28; Wed, 24 May 2017 06:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@ietf.org, Eric.Gray@Ericsson.com, mpls@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.51.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <149563272600.28525.2879582761085460802.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 06:32:06 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/aGj4eF_yAZ8ZEmQHU3WJTmgq7UA>
Subject: [mpls] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 13:32:06 -0000

Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-shared-ring-protection/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This document describes 3 different protection mechanisms and it
specifies that all nodes "MUST use the same protection mechanism".  When
should these mechanisms be used?  What are the conditions that an
operator should take into account when selecting between them?  I would
like to see operational considerations explained.