Re: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6428 (4415)

[Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>]

Greg,

I see no reason that we can't fix this if/when Deborah approves the
errata.

Deborah,

This is in your lap, can you tell us how you want to do this?

/Loa

On 2015-07-15 19:49, Gregory Mirsky wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> thank you for pointing to my mistake.
>
> Loa,
> if the errata cannot be corrected, please feel free to reject and I can re-submit with corrected reference to RFC 5880.
>
> 	Regards,
> 		Greg
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Allan I
> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 8:46 AM
> To: Loa Andersson; RFC Errata System; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Cc: Gregory Mirsky; [e-mail]
> Subject: RE: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6428 (4415)
>
> The errata is almost correct. The body suggests the correct text "RequiredMinRxInterval" which is correct and as the field is defined in 5880. (not RequestedMinRxInterval as appears under corrected text).
>
> Good catch
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loa Andersson [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 11:58 PM
> To: RFC Errata System; David Allan I; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Cc: Gregory Mirsky; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6428 (4415)
>
> Folks,
>
> The errata seems correct, but I'd like the authors to nod also , John, George and/or Dave.
>
> /Loa
>
> On 2015-07-15 02:22, RFC Errata System wrote:
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6428, "Proactive
>> Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check, and Remote Defect Indication for the MPLS Transport Profile".
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6428&eid=4415
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Editorial
>> Reported by: Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>
>>
>> Section: text
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> bfd.MinRxInterval
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> bfd.RequestedMinRxInterval
>>
>> Notes
>> -----
>> Throughout the text document refers to bfd.MinRxInterval even though RFC 5880 refers to this state variable as bfd.RequiredMinRxInterval.
>>
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected.
>> When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to
>> change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC6428 (draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-06)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check, and Remote Defect Indication for the MPLS Transport Profile
>> Publication Date    : November 2011
>> Author(s)           : D. Allan, Ed., G. Swallow Ed., J. Drake Ed.
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
>> Area                : Routing
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>>