Re: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5036 (4512)
Renato Westphal <renatowestphal@gmail.com> Sat, 31 October 2015 16:21 UTC
Return-Path: <renatowestphal@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED851A8715 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 09:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5sp2bR-TRam8 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 09:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B26111A7D81 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 09:21:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicfx6 with SMTP id fx6so27152240wic.1 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 09:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=6Q+dWdmTK88gr7bwujjtD9/coRIUanKiimhQj3cZJOg=; b=hz4vLR0vdlcm38P5vnnrmBAOzJ17JE7D7wGqdvSNoC1ryJah3jIVmjqwaRGwT+/hlx M+ffIiEkWvKpepWf6/cWDcfwu05Vu6k9CmDn7cjSq3uG/75kMvpexxFTLSTdJthC2h1Z 84zwJA3JcHYjNCKr44cvamqR7yEllJwti4t5FXKxHQjd7ARUV6X97T1esOolFkan/47p ljDyHp2XT5nQFOw0mFF/ETlJbOVdbIY/AfOIH0NLgwrisAf8kddG7w0fhIcwj2ytNJEr lHvbkg1PodvcU6gY89bG5aEhbvlerUwcwvnmCNh6QZ6A4g+ahd5jIDU2snfqdrjxy5IT nOnA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.71.84 with SMTP id s20mr14665267wju.89.1446308473197; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 09:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.28.31.20 with HTTP; Sat, 31 Oct 2015 09:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20151026101114.1E98A18046B@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20151026101114.1E98A18046B@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 14:21:13 -0200
Message-ID: <CAChaegk3Nrw_WJtNJdYh440f2Z=5mfLFTaMPSzF521JZDppdaA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Renato Westphal <renatowestphal@gmail.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/af7DJ1X4T8g7N4HyJ2czmT6-JEY>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, jiessie.xu@ericsson.com, rhthomas@cisco.com, rcallon@juniper.net, loa@pi.se, ina@juniper.net
Subject: Re: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5036 (4512)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 16:21:16 -0000
You need to read the RFC more carefully. The advertised Transport Address (implicity or explicity) is to be used only when opening a TCP connection with the neighbor. Link hello packets are always sent with a source address of the underlying interface. 2015-10-26 8:11 GMT-02:00 RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5036, > "LDP Specification". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5036&eid=4512 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Jiessie <jiessie.xu@ericsson.com> > > Section: 2.5.2 > > Original Text > ------------- > 2.4.1. Basic Discovery Mechanism > > To engage in LDP Basic Discovery on an interface, an LSR periodically > sends LDP Link Hellos out the interface. LDP Link Hellos are sent as > UDP packets addressed to the well-known LDP discovery port for the > \\"all routers on this subnet\\" group multicast address. > > > 2.5.2. Transport Connection Establishment > > Note that when an LSR sends a Hello, it selects the transport address > for its end of the session connection and uses the Hello to advertise > the address, either explicitly by including it in an optional > Transport Address TLV or implicitly by omitting the TLV and using it > as the Hello source address. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > > > Notes > ----- > According to 2.4.1, an LSR send Hellos to \\"all routers on this subnet\\", the eligible reception LSR should be on this subnet. > > 2.5.2 states that one way for an LSR to advertise Transport Address is to uses it as Hello source address. > > On the topology below, LSRa uses 1.1.1.1 as Transport Address and sends Hello(source:1.1.1.1 destination:224.0.0.2) to LSRb. > LSRb will ignore this packet which is not on its interface subnet. > > 1.1.1.1 > |LSRa|--------------|LSRb| > 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.2 > > My question is: > What\\'s the scenario to use \\"implicitly\\" way to send Hello? > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC5036 (draft-ietf-mpls-rfc3036bis-04) > -------------------------------------- > Title : LDP Specification > Publication Date : October 2007 > Author(s) : L. Andersson, Ed., I. Minei, Ed., B. Thomas, Ed. > Category : DRAFT STANDARD > Source : Multiprotocol Label Switching > Area : Routing > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls -- Renato Westphal
- [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5036 (4512) RFC Errata System
- Re: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5036 (4… Renato Westphal
- [mpls] [Errata Rejected] RFC5036 (4512) RFC Errata System