[mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-13

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Mon, 13 February 2017 21:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28EC512998E; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 13:51:40 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
To: <gen-art@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.43.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148702270016.25055.10297552659599192833.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 13:51:40 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/agsRlsBWPSZIRrwF9VuFFRCWJFQ>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-13
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 21:51:40 -0000

Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-13
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 2017-02-13
IETF LC End Date: 2017-01-17
IESG Telechat date: 2017-03-02

Summary: Ready for publication as PS

Thanks for addressing my comments.
(I still think some discussion about taking arrival and departure time
measurements would be helpful, even if it only said "do it
consistently so you don't indicate jitter that's not really there".)