Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-flow-ident

[Stewart Bryant <[e-mail]>]

There is IPR on the SL work which follows on from this (already declared 
against those documents).

This text calls up  draft-tempia-ippm-p3m-03 which has IPR, whether it 
needs to be formally declared I leave to the chairs to decide.

I know of no other IPR that relates directly to this document.

Stewart


On 22/10/2016 05:33, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> We are currently preparing draft-ietf-mpls-flow-ident-02 for working
> group last call. We will do an IPR poll prior to the wglc.
>
> This is to start the IPR Poll.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-flow-ident?
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> There is no IPR disclosure filed directly against this documents.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The
> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
> received from each author and contributor.
>
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
> /Loa
> mpls wg co-chair
>