Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-flow-ident

Stewart Bryant <> Mon, 24 October 2016 09:34 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04BBA129663; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dJTPc9LK4hAr; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC1C4129661; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id f134so26088924lfg.2; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3qf1v8XfKe7gYIU+E3Cmxutne3hLPfdAS6lS+1noQvg=; b=ktS2Gk2DLR40nWQlF8U/OqsuYmlmE8Pq1oMkNXS68b7bF7Zel4VqHJ95A/zB6jwgIm Shn6M2fOevD2s4okZeIJHk22ng+Ys4WMfbrOMdlIUbZazQz0iPRAgLzACg8qp/L1zaUr aP6boQkEcM9W5EMHKCoBadeqYbdaRSTDcGiPsIUB8QrZLUOHOpCi+e8IRqux+HaVsBHV WiJ0qNXcWxdphm/TzJmCLU0MkYDm2B8RlOo7GIo0EmgeZDSLpaWtlT0FyJmEMcOEFDq2 tcOeHmOnCS7rbk6oFdGYyhfUfbtHqiJcvqoLrGKamNWKTSGsBxUbMPGAWTisfpLH3C1n nMEg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3qf1v8XfKe7gYIU+E3Cmxutne3hLPfdAS6lS+1noQvg=; b=JzhVr9pq/ilLc7WUIcBAizeoog1Vts8lSJowhNklCggOU3GQPrvM89JZvGp211ehcJ epJ+RYEGvOKABe4PhU9izaVB6W0utg6/jNs+F/4TT1aUOyi4+0rIr4mpOIHw6+EKW5+V nasxRiCH4HHO/05Kr/JjfX3rTlNmTPUZ94agEsdbdBa5NNCGfoPfYMXsJ8zzg+AruzBz wyyjSz3eoWnOyja1tLv8aDDkgNLqYO1xOOCAdrox7JFQkiH2OvFikExcT45pTfHZqvNL rIlCgKRQCKch97nofljWGEuBGblYtS6swdwLSObt2atIcV1EFc+X4qe2yCrPYNfO/u+l t6Bg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvedSgrZD3iwWBq+x0k2TdQN834x6D2EnX7IeiQP779/EzIXJWIlQLjFyKk/2MCmsw==
X-Received: by with SMTP id h1mr10951194wjd.164.1477301646916; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] ( []) by with ESMTPSA id o1sm18334272wjh.9.2016. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Oct 2016 02:34:05 -0700 (PDT)
To: Loa Andersson <>, "" <>
References: <>
From: Stewart Bryant <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:34:03 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <>
Cc:, "" <>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-flow-ident
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:34:10 -0000

There is IPR on the SL work which follows on from this (already declared 
against those documents).

This text calls up  draft-tempia-ippm-p3m-03 which has IPR, whether it 
needs to be formally declared I leave to the chairs to decide.

I know of no other IPR that relates directly to this document.


On 22/10/2016 05:33, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
> We are currently preparing draft-ietf-mpls-flow-ident-02 for working
> group last call. We will do an IPR poll prior to the wglc.
> This is to start the IPR Poll.
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-mpls-flow-ident?
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
> There is no IPR disclosure filed directly against this documents.
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The
> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
> received from each author and contributor.
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> /Loa
> mpls wg co-chair